[PATCH 01/29] dt-bindings: media: mfc: Add Exynos MFC devicetree binding

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Tue, 30 Sept 2025 at 12:55, Himanshu Dewangan <h.dewangan at samsung.com> wrote:
>
> From: Nagaraju Siddineni <nagaraju.s at samsung.com>
>
> Introduce a new DT binding file for exynos-mfc
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/samsung,exynos-mfc.yaml
> which describes the Exynos Multi‑Format Codec (MFC) IP.  The schema
> covers the core node properties, required fields, and provides an
> example snippet.
>
> Signed-off-by: Himanshu Dewangan <h.dewangan at samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nagaraju Siddineni <nagaraju.s at samsung.com>
> ---
>  .../bindings/media/samsung,exynos-mfc.yaml    | 77 +++++++++++++++++++
>  MAINTAINERS                                   | 10 +++
>  2 files changed, 87 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/samsung,exynos-mfc.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/samsung,exynos-mfc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/samsung,exynos-mfc.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..fbed987fb9cf
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/samsung,exynos-mfc.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/media/samsung,exynos-mfc.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Samsung Exynos Multi Format Codec (MFC)
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Nagaraju Siddineni <nagaraju.s at samsung.com>
> +  - Himanshu Dewangan <h.dewangan at samsung.com>
> +
> +description:
> +  Multi Format Codec (MFC) is the IP present in Samsung SoCs which
> +  supports high resolution decoding and encoding functionalities.
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    oneOf:
> +      - enum:
> +          - samsung,exynos-mfc            # Exynos920
> +          - samsung,mfc_core0_mem         # Reserved Memory
> +          - samsung,mfc_core1_mem         # Reserved Memory


NAK

These bindings duplicate existing ones, do not follow any existing
standards (wrong compatible) and are written completely different than
any other binding, which means you probably created big AI slop.

I'm not going to review this, it's quality is just beyond basic
standards. Sending something like this from Samsung means you do not
respect our time. You need to stay from scratch and read existing
documentation and existing bindings

I'll be organizing a mini meeting with Samsung on 13th Oct in Seoul,
feel free to join if you are around. I can explain then more why
wasting our time is making me very grumpy.

Best regards,
Krzysztof