[PATCH 03/10] dt-bindings: dma: Add RDA IFC DMA

[Rob Herring]

On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 01:48:43AM +0700, Dang Huynh wrote:
> The Intelligent Flow Controller (IFC) is a scatter/gather DMA
> controller.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dang Huynh <dang.huynh at mainlining.org>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/rda,ifc.yaml | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/dt-bindings/dma/rda-ifc.h                  | 28 ++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 73 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/rda,ifc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/rda,ifc.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..323e1e87cee09cfc7b64bf44bef61e4d1e91afa5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/rda,ifc.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/dma/rda,ifc.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: RDA Intelligent Flow Controller (IFC)
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Dang Huynh <dang.huynh at mainlining.org>
> +
> +description: |

Don't need '|'.

> +  RDA IFC is a DMA controller, it only supports scatter/gather lists.
> +
> +allOf:
> +  - $ref: dma-controller.yaml#
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    items:
> +      - enum:
> +          - rda,8810pl-ifc
> +      - const: rda,ifc
> +
> +  reg:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  "#dma-cells":
> +    const: 1
> +    description:
> +      The cell corresponding to DMA request ID
> +
> +required:
> +  - compatible
> +  - reg
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> +  - |
> +    dma-controller at f0000 {
> +      compatible = "rda,8810pl-ifc", "rda,ifc";
> +      reg = <0xf0000 0x1000>;
> +      #dma-cells = <1>;
> +    };
> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/dma/rda-ifc.h b/include/dt-bindings/dma/rda-ifc.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..af4bae0542aa71690351e2406d0945a61eff72c1
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/dma/rda-ifc.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause */
> +
> +#ifndef __DT_BINDINGS_DMA_RDA_IFC_H__
> +#define __DT_BINDINGS_DMA_RDA_IFC_H__
> +
> +#define IFC_UART1_TX		0
> +#define IFC_UART1_RX		1
> +#define IFC_UART2_TX		2
> +#define IFC_UART2_RX		3
> +#define IFC_SPI1_TX		4
> +#define IFC_SPI1_RX		5
> +#define IFC_SPI2_TX		6
> +#define IFC_SPI2_RX		7
> +#define IFC_SPI3_TX		8
> +#define IFC_SPI3_RX		9
> +#define IFC_SDMMC1_TX		10
> +#define IFC_SDMMC1_RX		11
> +#define IFC_SDMMC2_TX		12
> +#define IFC_SDMMC2_RX		13
> +#define IFC_SDMMC3_TX		14
> +#define IFC_SDMMC3_RX		15
> +#define IFC_NFSC_TX		16
> +#define IFC_NFSC_RX		17
> +#define IFC_UART3_TX		18
> +#define IFC_UART3_RX		19
> +#define IFC_NO_REQUEST		20

These numbers are defined by the h/w (like IRQ numbers)? If so, drop the 
header. We don't do headers for h/w numbers.

Rob