[PATCH v7 2/4] net: can: rockchip: Refactor the rkcanfd_devtype_data structure

[Marc Kleine-Budde]

On 22.09.2025 15:15:41, Elaine Zhang wrote:
> Add new function pointer:
> Encapsulate some hardware operation functions into
> rkcanfd_devtype_data to provide differentiated implementations for
> different models (such as RK3568v2/v3).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing at rock-chips.com>

[...]

> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/rockchip/rockchip_canfd.h b/drivers/net/can/rockchip/rockchip_canfd.h
> index 93131c7d7f54..bcd26d23062b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/can/rockchip/rockchip_canfd.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/rockchip/rockchip_canfd.h
> @@ -436,9 +436,20 @@ enum rkcanfd_model {
>  	RKCANFD_MODEL_RK3568V3 = 0x35683,
>  };
>  
> +struct rkcanfd_priv;
> +
>  struct rkcanfd_devtype_data {
>  	enum rkcanfd_model model;
>  	u32 quirks;
> +	void (*get_berr_counter)(struct rkcanfd_priv *priv, struct can_berr_counter *bec);
> +	void (*interrupts_enable)(const struct rkcanfd_priv *priv);
> +	void (*interrupts_disable)(const struct rkcanfd_priv *priv);
> +	void (*fifo_setup)(struct rkcanfd_priv *priv);

Why do you make fifo setup a function pointer if it's only called from
chip_start, which you make a function pointer, too?

Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde          |
Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de |
Vertretung Nürnberg              | Phone: +49-5121-206917-129 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-9   |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20250922/3272b1c2/attachment.sig>