[PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: reset: microchip: Add LAN969x support

[Robert Marko]

On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 7:38 PM Conor Dooley <conor at kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 01:12:35PM +0200, Robert Marko wrote:
> > LAN969x also uses the Microchip reset driver, so document its compatible.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robert.marko at sartura.hr>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/microchip,rst.yaml | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/microchip,rst.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/microchip,rst.yaml
> > index f2da0693b05a..4d4dd47f830e 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/microchip,rst.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/microchip,rst.yaml
> > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ properties:
> >      enum:
> >        - microchip,sparx5-switch-reset
> >        - microchip,lan966x-switch-reset
> > +      - microchip,lan969x-switch-reset
>
> Driver patch makes a fallback compatible seem usable.

Hi Conor,
Will respin to simply use the fallback compatible, that will avoid
adding more compatibles to the driver
for no reason.

But, can I ask what do you think about the
microchip,lan969x-switch-reset compatible?
Is lan969x fine or should I just make it lan9691 or like cause the
whole series uses the same
reset setup?

Regards,
Robert
>
> >
> >    reg:
> >      items:
> > --
> > 2.51.0
> >



-- 
Robert Marko
Staff Embedded Linux Engineer
Sartura d.d.
Lendavska ulica 16a
10000 Zagreb, Croatia
Email: robert.marko at sartura.hr
Web: www.sartura.hr