[PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: pcie: Add the NXP PCIe controller

[Bjorn Helgaas]

Suggest following convention for subject lines (run "git log --oneline
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/"), e.g.,

  dt-bindings: PCI: s32g: Add NXP PCIe controller

On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 04:14:33PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Describe the PCIe controller available on the S32G platforms.

> +        pcie0: pcie at 40400000 {
> +            compatible = "nxp,s32g3-pcie",
> +                         "nxp,s32g2-pcie";
> +            dma-coherent;
> +            reg = <0x00 0x40400000 0x0 0x00001000>,   /* dbi registers */
> +                  <0x00 0x40420000 0x0 0x00001000>,   /* dbi2 registers */
> +                  <0x00 0x40460000 0x0 0x00001000>,   /* atu registers */
> +                  <0x00 0x40470000 0x0 0x00001000>,   /* dma registers */
> +                  <0x00 0x40481000 0x0 0x000000f8>,   /* ctrl registers */
> +                  /* RC configuration space, 4KB each for cfg0 and cfg1
> +                   * at the end of the outbound memory map
> +                   */
> +                  <0x5f 0xffffe000 0x0 0x00002000>,
> +                  <0x58 0x00000000 0x0 0x40000000>; /* 1GB EP addr space */
> +                  reg-names = "dbi", "dbi2", "atu", "dma", "ctrl",
> +                              "config", "addr_space";

Looks like an indentation error.  Shouldn't "reg-names" and subsequent
properties be aligned under "reg"?

> +                  #address-cells = <3>;
> +                  #size-cells = <2>;
> +                  device_type = "pci";
> +                  ranges =
> +                  /* downstream I/O, 64KB and aligned naturally just
> +                   * before the config space to minimize fragmentation
> +                   */
> +                  <0x81000000 0x0 0x00000000 0x5f 0xfffe0000 0x0 0x00010000>,
> +                  /* non-prefetchable memory, with best case size and
> +                  * alignment
> +                   */
> +                  <0x82000000 0x0 0x00000000 0x58 0x00000000 0x7 0xfffe0000>;
> +
> +                  nxp,phy-mode = "crns";

If "nxp,phy-mode" goes with "phys", should it be adjacent to it?

> +                  bus-range = <0x0 0xff>;
> +                  interrupts =  <GIC_SPI 124 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> +                                <GIC_SPI 123 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> +                                <GIC_SPI 125 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> +                                <GIC_SPI 126 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> +                                <GIC_SPI 127 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> +                                <GIC_SPI 132 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> +                                <GIC_SPI 133 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> +                                <GIC_SPI 134 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +                  interrupt-names = "link_req_stat", "dma", "msi",
> +                                    "phy_link_down", "phy_link_up", "misc",
> +                                    "pcs", "tlp_req_no_comp";
> +                  #interrupt-cells = <1>;
> +                  interrupt-map-mask = <0 0 0 0x7>;
> +                  interrupt-map = <0 0 0 1 &gic 0 0 0 128 4>,
> +                                  <0 0 0 2 &gic 0 0 0 129 4>,
> +                                  <0 0 0 3 &gic 0 0 0 130 4>,
> +                                  <0 0 0 4 &gic 0 0 0 131 4>;
> +                  msi-parent = <&gic>;
> +
> +                  num-lanes = <2>;
> +                  phys = <&serdes0 PHY_TYPE_PCIE 0 0>;
> +        };
> +    };