[PATCH] mm: introduce ARCH_PAGE_TABLE_SYNC_MASK_VMALLOC to sync kernel mapping conditionally

Harry Yoo harry.yoo at oracle.com
Wed Sep 17 09:41:04 PDT 2025


On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 11:48:29PM +0800, alexjlzheng at gmail.com wrote:
> From: Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng at tencent.com>
> 
> After commit 6eb82f994026 ("x86/mm: Pre-allocate P4D/PUD pages for
> vmalloc area"), we don't need to synchronize kernel mappings in the
> vmalloc area on x86_64.

Right.

> And commit 58a18fe95e83 ("x86/mm/64: Do not sync vmalloc/ioremap
> mappings") actually does this.

Right.

> But commit 6659d0279980 ("x86/mm/64: define ARCH_PAGE_TABLE_SYNC_MASK
> and arch_sync_kernel_mappings()") breaks this.

Good point.

> This patch introduces ARCH_PAGE_TABLE_SYNC_MASK_VMALLOC to avoid
> unnecessary kernel mappings synchronization of the vmalloc area.
> 
> Fixes: 6659d0279980 ("x86/mm/64: define ARCH_PAGE_TABLE_SYNC_MASK and arch_sync_kernel_mappings()")

The commit is getting backported to -stable kernels.

Do you think this can cause a visible performance regression from
user point of view, or it's just a nice optimization to have?
(and any data to support?)

> Signed-off-by: Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng at tencent.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/include/asm/page.h                 | 3 ++-
>  arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable-2level_types.h | 3 ++-
>  arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable-3level_types.h | 3 ++-
>  include/linux/pgtable.h                     | 4 ++++
>  mm/memory.c                                 | 2 +-
>  mm/vmalloc.c                                | 6 +++---
>  6 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index 0ba4f6b71847..cd2488043f8f 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -3170,7 +3170,7 @@ static int __apply_to_page_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
>  			break;
>  	} while (pgd++, addr = next, addr != end);
>  
> -	if (mask & ARCH_PAGE_TABLE_SYNC_MASK)
> +	if (mask & ARCH_PAGE_TABLE_SYNC_MASK_VMALLOC)
>  		arch_sync_kernel_mappings(start, start + size);

But vmalloc is not the only user of apply_to_page_range()?

-- 
Cheers,
Harry / Hyeonggon



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list