[PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Simplify printks with pOF format
Krzysztof Kozlowski
krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org
Fri Sep 12 02:34:53 PDT 2025
On 12/09/2025 11:24, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Print full device node name with %pOF format, so the code will be a bit
> simpler.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c | 13 ++++++-------
> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/transports/mailbox.c | 7 +++----
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c
> index 24e59ddf85e7..c7698cfaa4e8 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c
> @@ -401,8 +401,8 @@ static void scmi_device_release(struct device *dev)
>
> static void __scmi_device_destroy(struct scmi_device *scmi_dev)
> {
> - pr_debug("(%s) Destroying SCMI device '%s' for protocol 0x%x (%s)\n",
> - of_node_full_name(scmi_dev->dev.parent->of_node),
> + pr_debug("(%pOF) Destroying SCMI device '%s' for protocol 0x%x (%s)\n",
> + scmi_dev->dev.parent->of_node,
> dev_name(&scmi_dev->dev), scmi_dev->protocol_id,
> scmi_dev->name);
Heh, I misread the docs and see now in the testing that my patch changes
the behavior. of_node_full_name() is just node name. pOF is full path.
This might be desired or not...
Best regards,
Krzysztof
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list