[PATCH 10/33] arm_mpam: Add probe/remove for mpam msc driver and kbuild boiler plate

[James Morse]

Hi Shaopeng,

On 09/09/2025 08:03, Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu) wrote:
>> Probing MPAM is convoluted. MSCs that are integrated with a CPU may only be
>> accessible from those CPUs, and they may not be online.
>> Touching the hardware early is pointless as MPAM can't be used until the
>> system-wide common values for num_partid and num_pmg have been
>> discovered.
>>
>> Start with driver probe/remove and mapping the MSC.

>> diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
>> new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..a0d9a699a6e7
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,336 @@

>> +static int mpam_dt_parse_resources(struct mpam_msc *msc, void *ignored)
>> +{
>> +	int err, num_ris = 0;
>> +	const u32 *ris_idx_p;
>> +	struct device_node *iter, *np;
>> +
>> +	np = msc->pdev->dev.of_node;
>> +	for_each_child_of_node(np, iter) {
>> +		ris_idx_p = of_get_property(iter, "reg", NULL);
>> +		if (ris_idx_p) {
>> +			num_ris++;
>> +			err = mpam_dt_parse_resource(msc, iter, *ris_idx_p);
>> +			if (err) {
>> +				of_node_put(iter);
>> +				return err;
>> +			}
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (!num_ris)
>> +		mpam_dt_parse_resource(msc, np, 0);

> err = mpam_dt_parse_resource(msc, np, 0);

Oops! Thanks for catching that,


James