[PATCH rfcv2 1/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Clear cmds->num after arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_submit

[Nicolin Chen]

On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 01:16:11PM +1000, Balbir Singh wrote:
> On 9/9/25 09:26, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> > None of the callers of arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_submit() cares about the batch
> > after a submission. So, it'll be certainly safe to nuke the cmds->num, at
> > least upon a successful one. This will ease a bit a wrapper function, for
> > the new arm_smmu_invs structure.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc at nvidia.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 10 ++++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> > index 2a8b46b948f05..cccf8f52ee0d5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> > @@ -974,11 +974,17 @@ static void arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_add(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
> >  	cmds->num++;
> >  }
> >  
> > +/* Clears cmds->num after a successful submission */
> >  static int arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_submit(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
> >  				      struct arm_smmu_cmdq_batch *cmds)
> >  {
> 
> Nit: arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_submit_clear()?

Probably not. There is no particular point in highlighting it in
the function name, as there is no use case wanting an uncleared
version.

Thanks
Nicolin