[PATCH v3 4/5] firmware: exynos-acpm: register ACPM clocks pdev
Tudor Ambarus
tudor.ambarus at linaro.org
Mon Sep 8 00:46:42 PDT 2025
On 9/6/25 1:20 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 03/09/2025 15:56, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
>> Register by hand a platform device for the ACPM clocks.
>> The ACPM clocks are not modeled as a DT child of ACPM because:
>> 1/ they don't have their own resources.
>> 2/ they are not a block that can be reused. The clock identifying
>> data is reduced (clock ID, clock name and mailbox channel ID)
>> and may differ from a SoC to another.
>
> If I understand patchset correctly (and your cover letter supports
> that), this does not depend on patch #3, so please move it before that
> one, so both firmware patches are one after another.
You're correct.
#3 depends on #2 and I thought you wanted the minimum dependencies listed
somehow, so that the clock subsystem doesn't pull extra patches (that would
be #4). I will move #4 in between current #2 and #3.
Thanks!
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list