[PATCH] regulator: dt-bindings: rpi-panel: Split 7" Raspberry Pi 720x1280 v2 binding
Marek Vasut
marek.vasut at mailbox.org
Fri Sep 5 11:55:16 PDT 2025
On 9/5/25 8:46 PM, Conor Dooley wrote:
Hi,
>> +examples:
>> + - |
>> + i2c {
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>> + gpio at 45 {
>
> ngl, seems strange to classify the device as a regulator in directory
> and name, but use gpio as the node name in the example.
>
> Otherwise, this seems fine - if you feel that the hardware is
> substantively differentially to what's in the "v1" regulator then
> keeping them apart is valid.
> Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley at microchip.com>
I can rename it to "mcu@" or "mfd@" some such ?
I originally thought it could be compatible with the V1, which is why I
tried to conflate them into single binding in 6d09c6e474bd ("regulator:
dt-bindings: rpi-panel: Add regulator for 7" Raspberry Pi 720x1280") ,
but they are too different, so this undoes the change and creates
separate binding.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list