[PATCH v5 1/4] dt-bindings: rtc: Document NVIDIA VRS RTC

[Shubhi Garg]

On 05/08/25 11:48 am, Shubhi Garg wrote:
> 
> 
> On 25/07/25 7:09 pm, Shubhi Garg wrote:
>>
>> On 24/07/25 4:20 pm, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>>
>>> On 24/07/2025 11:06, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 24/07/2025 11:41, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 24/07/2025 08:59, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 01:03:40PM +0000, Shubhi Garg wrote:
>>>>>>> +description:
>>>>>>> +  NVIDIA VRS (Voltage Regulator Specification) RTC provides 
>>>>>>> 32kHz RTC clock
>>>>>>> +  support with backup battery for system timing. It provides 
>>>>>>> alarm functionality
>>>>>>> +  to wake system from suspend and shutdown state. The device 
>>>>>>> also acts as an
>>>>>>> +  interrupt controller for managing interrupts from the VRS.
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +properties:
>>>>>>> +  compatible:
>>>>>>> +    const: nvidia,vrs10-rtc
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nothing improved. You never replied to comments and then replaced one
>>>>>> redundant word into other redundant word.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Respond to review or implement it fully, not partially.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Or add COMPLETE bindings, not partial ones. See writing bindings doc.
>>>>>
>>>>> OK, right so the DT binding should describe the overall PMIC device,
>>>>> even though the driver needs to support the RTC.
>> VRS-10 is the device name. VRS-10 has an I2C interface and implements 
>> a Power Sequencer,
>> RTC , 32kHZ clock output. From software perspective, we are handling 
>> VRS-10 interrupts and
>> providing RTC driver support. I will add complete VRS-10 information 
>> in bindings.
> 
> VRS-10 hardware specifications are completely designed by NVIDIA.
> NVIDIA is getting chip manufactured by multiple vendors.
> Therefore, part number and vendor ID varies on each NVIDIA platform 
> revisions.
> But, our software is independent of vendor details.
> So, is it okay to keep compatible string as "nvidia, vrs-10" in VRS-10 
> RTC driver ?
> 
> 

I plan to use the compatible string "nvidia,vrs-10" for this device as 
there has been no further feedback.

-- 
Regards,
Shubhi