[PATCH] coresight: perf: Fix pointer check with IS_ERR_OR_NULL()
James Clark
james.clark at linaro.org
Thu Sep 4 05:11:37 PDT 2025
On 04/09/2025 1:00 pm, James Clark wrote:
>
>
> On 04/09/2025 11:53 am, Leo Yan wrote:
>> The returned pointer from .alloc_buffer() callback can be an error, if
>> only checking NULL pointer the driver cannot capture errors. The driver
>> will proceed even after failure and cause kernel panic.
>>
>> Change to use IS_ERR_OR_NULL() check for capture error cases.
>>
>> Fixes: 0bcbf2e30ff2 ("coresight: etm-perf: new PMU driver for ETM
>> tracers")
>> Reported-by: Tamas Zsoldos <tamas.zsoldos at arm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan at arm.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.c b/
>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.c
>> index
>> f677c08233ba1a28b277674662c6e6db904873dd..440d967f5d0962df187a81b0dd69a7d82a8b62ba 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.c
>> @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ static void free_sink_buffer(struct etm_event_data
>> *event_data)
>> cpumask_t *mask = &event_data->mask;
>> struct coresight_device *sink;
>> - if (!event_data->snk_config)
>> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(event_data->snk_config))
>> return;
>> if (WARN_ON(cpumask_empty(mask)))
>> @@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ static void *etm_setup_aux(struct perf_event
>> *event, void **pages,
>> event_data->snk_config =
>> sink_ops(sink)->alloc_buffer(sink, event, pages,
>> nr_pages, overwrite);
>> - if (!event_data->snk_config)
>> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(event_data->snk_config))
>> goto err;
>
> I think the bug is in TRBE. It's the only one that returns an error
> pointer, but only for -ENOMEM which would normally be NULL for alloc
> type functions anyway.
>
> Also it's assigned to event_data->snk_config which is later NULL checked
> rather than IS_ERR_OR_NULL in free_sink_buffer(). Maybe that path
> doesn't happen, but all instances should be updated anyway.
Oh sorry I was only looking at the update to etm_setup_aux() so both
functions are covered. But the other points still apply.
>
> It's much easier to keep it as NULL and make the fix in TRBE. It also
> wouldn't need to be backported as far.
>
>> out:
>>
>> ---
>> base-commit: fa71e9cb4cfa59abb196229667ec84929bdc18fe
>> change-id: 20250904-cs_etm_auxsetup_fix_error_handling-cb7e07ed9adf
>>
>> Best regards,
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list