[PATCH net] net: stmmac: dwmac-rk: Ensure clk_phy doesn't contain invalid address

[Yao Zi]

On Thu, Sep 04, 2025 at 10:56:57AM +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2025 at 10:54:57AM +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 04, 2025 at 03:12:24AM +0000, Yao Zi wrote:
> > > We must set the clk_phy pointer to NULL to indicating it isn't available
> > > if the optional phy clock couldn't be obtained. Otherwise the error code
> > > returned by of_clk_get() could be wrongly taken as an address, causing
> > > invalid pointer dereference when later clk_phy is passed to
> > > clk_prepare_enable().
> > > 
> > > Fixes: da114122b831 ("net: ethernet: stmmac: dwmac-rk: Make the clk_phy could be used for external phy")
> > > Signed-off-by: Yao Zi <ziyao at disroot.org>
> > 
> > ...
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I this patch doesn't seem to match upstream code.
> > 
> > Looking over the upstream code, it seems to me that
> > going into the code in question .clk_phy should
> > be NULL, as bsp_priv it is allocated using devm_kzalloc()
> > over in rk_gmac_setup()
> > 
> > While the upstream version of the code your patch modifies
> > is as follows. And doesn't touch .clk_phy if integrated_phy is not set.
> > 
> >         if (plat->phy_node && bsp_priv->integrated_phy) {
> >                 bsp_priv->clk_phy = of_clk_get(plat->phy_node, 0);
> >                 ret = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(bsp_priv->clk_phy);
> >                 if (ret)
> >                         return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Cannot get PHY clock\n");
> >                 clk_set_rate(bsp_priv->clk_phy, 50000000);
> >         }
> > 
> > Am I missing something?
> 
> Oops, I missed that da114122b831 is present in net-next (but not net).
> Let me look over this a second time.

Oops, yes. Though this is a fix patch, it should target net-next instead
of net since the commit causing problems hasn't landed in net. Sorry for
the confusion.

Best regards,
Yao Zi