[PATCH] arm64: kvm: Fix incorrect VNCR invalidation range calculation
Marc Zyngier
maz at kernel.org
Thu Sep 4 02:29:09 PDT 2025
On Wed, 03 Sep 2025 13:39:49 +0100,
p at sswd.pw wrote:
>
> From: leedongha <gapdev2004 at gmail.com>
>
> The code for invalidating VNCR entries in both kvm_invalidate_vncr_ipa()
> and invalidate_vncr_va() incorrectly uses a bitwise AND with `(size - 1)`
> instead of `~(size - 1)` to align the start address. This results
> in masking the address bits instead of aligning them down to the start
> of the block.
>
> This bug may cause stale VNCR TLB entries to remain valid even after a
> TLBI or MMU notifier, leading to incorrect memory translation and
> unexpected guest behavior.
>
> Credit
> Team 0xB6 in bob14:
> DongHa Lee (@GAP-dev)
> Gyujeong Jin (@G1uN4sh)
> Daehyeon Ko (@4ncienth)
> Geonha Lee (@leegn4a)
> Hyungyu Oh (@DQPC_lover)
> Jaewon Yang (@R4mbb1)
>
> Signed-off-by: leedongha <gapdev2004 at gmail.com>
The SoB of the person sending the patch is required.
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
> index 77db81bae86f..d0ddce877b5d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
> @@ -847,7 +847,7 @@ static void kvm_invalidate_vncr_ipa(struct kvm *kvm, u64 start, u64 end)
>
> ipa_size = ttl_to_size(pgshift_level_to_ttl(vt->wi.pgshift,
> vt->wr.level));
> - ipa_start = vt->wr.pa & (ipa_size - 1);
> + ipa_start = vt->wr.pa & ~(ipa_size - 1);
> ipa_end = ipa_start + ipa_size;
>
> if (ipa_end <= start || ipa_start >= end)
> @@ -887,7 +887,7 @@ static void invalidate_vncr_va(struct kvm *kvm,
>
> va_size = ttl_to_size(pgshift_level_to_ttl(vt->wi.pgshift,
> vt->wr.level));
> - va_start = vt->gva & (va_size - 1);
> + va_start = vt->gva & ~(va_size - 1);
> va_end = va_start + va_size;
>
> switch (scope->type) {
Yup, absolutely correct. Thanks a lot for spotting this.
With the above nit addressed:
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <maz at kernel.org>
M.
--
Jazz isn't dead. It just smells funny.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list