[PATCH net-next v2 2/8] dt-bindings: remoteproc: k3-r5f: Add rpmsg-eth subnode

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 02:37:40PM +0530, MD Danish Anwar wrote:
> Extend the Texas Instruments K3 R5F remoteproc device tree bindings to
> include a 'rpmsg-eth' subnode.
> 
> This extension allows the RPMsg Ethernet to be defined as a subnode of
> K3 R5F remoteproc nodes, enabling the configuration of shared memory-based
> Ethernet communication between the host and remote processors.
> 
> Signed-off-by: MD Danish Anwar <danishanwar at ti.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-r5f-rproc.yaml     | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-r5f-rproc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-r5f-rproc.yaml
> index a492f74a8608..4dbd708ec8ee 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-r5f-rproc.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-r5f-rproc.yaml
> @@ -210,6 +210,12 @@ patternProperties:
>            should be defined as per the generic bindings in,
>            Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/sram.yaml
>  
> +      rpmsg-eth:
> +        $ref: /schemas/net/ti,rpmsg-eth.yaml

No, not a separate device. Please read slides from my DT for beginners
talk from OSSE25. This is EXACTLY the case I covered there - what not to
do.

Best regards,
Krzysztof