[PATCH v7 01/16] pinctrl: check the return value of pinmux_ops::get_function_name()
Bartosz Golaszewski
brgl at bgdev.pl
Tue Sep 2 04:59:10 PDT 2025
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski at linaro.org>
While the API contract in docs doesn't specify it explicitly, the
generic implementation of the get_function_name() callback from struct
pinmux_ops - pinmux_generic_get_function_name() - can fail and return
NULL. This is already checked in pinmux_check_ops() so add a similar
check in pinmux_func_name_to_selector() instead of passing the returned
pointer right down to strcmp() where the NULL can get dereferenced. This
is normal operation when adding new pinfunctions.
Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
Tested-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong at linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski at linaro.org>
---
drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.c
index 79814758a084570adea0ea1a3151d186f65d1d1f..07a478b2c48740c24a32e6ac8f10df4876e718e3 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.c
@@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ static int pinmux_func_name_to_selector(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
while (selector < nfuncs) {
const char *fname = ops->get_function_name(pctldev, selector);
- if (!strcmp(function, fname))
+ if (fname && !strcmp(function, fname))
return selector;
selector++;
--
2.48.1
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list