[PATCH 3/4] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add HINLINK H68K
Erik Beck
xunil at tahomasoft.com
Tue Sep 2 05:10:14 PDT 2025
On Tue, 2 Sep 2025 15:00:19 +0800
Chukun Pan <amadeus at jmu.edu.cn> wrote:
> Hi,
Greetings!
>
> > So what I said earlier regarding rgmii vs rgmii-id DOES NOT hold up
> > under more rigorous and careful testing.
>
> So the following question does not exist?
Yes, that is correct. My earlier question/comment/concern about a huge speed
difference between rgmii-id mode and rmgmii doesn't seem to exist when more
careful experiments and testing methods are used. I'll elaborate some more
below. And I apologize for any inconvenience.
> >> Changing this makes a huge difference in the ethernet throughput speed.
> >> With rgmii-id mode specified, throughput is about 6.5 Mbs. Changing this
> >> to rgmii mode increases throughput to about 960 Mbs.
>
I'm still a bit surprised that my first test method (web-based, like fast.com
or self-hosted internal download speeds) gave such different results from more
comprehensive and careful testing with iperf3. While certainly web-based
methods can't target a particular interface, nor do they have many other
potential adjustments or refinements (UDP vs TCP, etc), they have been and
continue to be a useful tool for me to get quick information about the status
and health of my network and its devices.
> If the iperf3 test does not reach Gigabit, you can run it in
> multiple threads. e.g. `iperf3 -c xxx -P 4`
Thanks for the tip.
I remain keenly interested in seeing a patch for the Hinlink/LinkStar devices
make it into the mainline kernel. Please let me know how I can help your
(and others) efforts to accomplish that.
Regards,
Erik
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list