[PATCH v4 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: ti,tcan104x-can: Document NXP TJA105X/1048
Conor Dooley
conor at kernel.org
Mon Sep 1 12:00:25 PDT 2025
On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 07:54:01PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 11:18:11AM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
> > The TJA105[1,7] is a high-speed CAN transceiver which is a pin-compatible
> > alternative for TI TCAN1043 with sleep mode supported, and has a compatible
> > programming model, therefore use ti,tcan1043 as fallback compatible.
> >
> > The TJA1048 is a dual high-speed CAN transceiver with sleep mode supported.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li at nxp.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan at nxp.com>
> > ---
> > .../devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml
> > index 4a8c3829d85d3c4a4963750d03567c1c345beb91..f8e0c24856a2ba83b5c988b246464f47e11a032f 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml
> > @@ -19,18 +19,25 @@ properties:
> > - enum:
> > - microchip,ata6561
> > - const: ti,tcan1042
> > + - items:
> > + - enum:
> > + - nxp,tja1051
> > + - nxp,tja1057
> > + - const: ti,tcan1043
> > - enum:
> > - ti,tcan1042
> > - ti,tcan1043
> > + - nxp,tja1048
> > - nxp,tjr1443
> >
> > '#phy-cells':
> > - const: 0
> > + enum: [0, 1]
> >
> > standby-gpios:
> > description:
> > gpio node to toggle standby signal on transceiver
> > - maxItems: 1
> > + minItems: 1
> > + maxItems: 2
>
> You're adding a second standby gpio, which one is which?
> I assume you mean that item 1 is stbn1 and item 2 is stbn 2 for tja1048.
> Might be kinda obvious, but I think it should be mentioned.
>
> tja105{1,7} don't have a standby gpio, but they do have a silent mode.
> silent mode seems fundamentally different to standby, since the receiver
> still works. Seems like that should be handled differently, no?
The docs for standby mode for the tcan1043 don't match with the tja1051,
"Standby mode is a low power mode where the driver and receiver are
disabled," so does the fallback compatible even make sense? Seems like a
combination of enable and standby gpios are used to put the tcan device
into silent mode but the tja1051 has a pin for that alone and seemingly
does not support standby at all?
>
> >
> > enable-gpios:
> > description:
> > @@ -53,6 +60,25 @@ required:
> > - compatible
> > - '#phy-cells'
> >
> > +allOf:
> > + - if:
> > + properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + contains:
> > + const: nxp,tja1048
> > + then:
> > + properties:
> > + '#phy-cells':
> > + const: 1
> > + standby-gpios:
> > + minItems: 2
> > + else:
> > + properties:
> > + '#phy-cells':
> > + const: 0
> > + standby-gpios:
> > + maxItems: 1
> > +
> > additionalProperties: false
> >
> > examples:
> >
> > --
> > 2.37.1
> >
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20250901/74b774e5/attachment.sig>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list