[PATCH] KVM: arm64: nested: Fix VA sign extension in VNCR/TLBI paths
Marc Zyngier
maz at kernel.org
Mon Sep 1 07:26:06 PDT 2025
On Mon, 01 Sep 2025 15:15:51 +0100,
Gyujeong Jin <wlsrbwjd7232 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: gyutrange <wlsrbwjd643 at naver.com>
>
> VNCR/TLBI VA reconstruction currently uses bit 48 as the sign bit,
> but for 48-bit virtual addresses the correct sign bit is bit 47.
No, that's not the case. Bit 55 is used at all times to determine
which half of the address space a VA gets resolved from.
> Using 48 can mis-canonicalize addresses in the negative half and may
> cause missed invalidations.
>
> Although VNCR_EL2 encodes other architectural fields (RESS, BADDR;
> see Arm ARM D24.2.206), sign_extend64() interprets its second argument
> as the index of the sign bit. Passing 48 prevents propagation of the
> canonical sign bit for 48-bit VAs.
>
> Impact:
> - Incorrect canonicalization of VAs with bit47=1
No. We are not trying to make the VA canonical.
> - Potential stale VNCR pseudo-TLB entries after TLBI or MMU notifier
No. The pseudo TLB is never created the first place.
> - Possible incorrect translation/permissions or DoS when combined
> with other issues
Please explain, as "other issues" is not a valid argument.
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list