[PATCH v3 04/29] ACPI / PPTT: Add a helper to fill a cpumask from a cache_id
Ben Horgan
ben.horgan at arm.com
Mon Oct 20 03:45:33 PDT 2025
Hi James,
On 10/17/25 19:56, James Morse wrote:
> MPAM identifies CPUs by the cache_id in the PPTT cache structure.
>
> The driver needs to know which CPUs are associated with the cache.
> The CPUs may not all be online, so cacheinfo does not have the
> information.
>
> Add a helper to pull this information out of the PPTT.
>
> CC: Rohit Mathew <Rohit.Mathew at arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse at arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla at arm.com>
> Tested-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay at nvidia.com>
> ---
> Changes since v2:
> * Removed stray cleanup useage in preference for acpi_get_pptt().
> * Removed WARN_ON_ONCE() for symmetry with other helpers.
> * Dropped restriction on unified caches.
>
> Changes since v1:
> * Added punctuation to the commit message.
> * Removed a comment about an alternative implementaion.
> * Made the loop continue with a warning if a CPU is missing from the PPTT.
>
> Changes since RFC:
> * acpi_count_levels() now returns a value.
> * Converted the table-get stuff to use Jonathan's cleanup helper.
> * Dropped Sudeep's Review tag due to the cleanup change.
> ---
> drivers/acpi/pptt.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/acpi.h | 6 +++++
> 2 files changed, 70 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pptt.c b/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
> index 50c8f2a3c927..2f86f58699a6 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
> @@ -985,3 +985,67 @@ int find_acpi_cache_level_from_id(u32 cache_id)
>
> return -ENOENT;
> }
> +
> +/**
> + * acpi_pptt_get_cpumask_from_cache_id() - Get the cpus associated with the
> + * specified cache
> + * @cache_id: The id field of the cache
> + * @cpus: Where to build the cpumask
> + *
> + * Determine which CPUs are below this cache in the PPTT. This allows the property
> + * to be found even if the CPUs are offline.
> + *
> + * The PPTT table must be rev 3 or later,
> + *
> + * Return: -ENOENT if the PPTT doesn't exist, or the cache cannot be found.
> + * Otherwise returns 0 and sets the cpus in the provided cpumask.
> + */
> +int acpi_pptt_get_cpumask_from_cache_id(u32 cache_id, cpumask_t *cpus)
> +{
> + int level, cpu;
> + u32 acpi_cpu_id;
> + struct acpi_pptt_cache *cache;
> + struct acpi_table_header *table;
> + struct acpi_pptt_cache_v1 *cache_v1;
> + struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu_node;
> +
> + cpumask_clear(cpus);
> +
> + table = acpi_get_pptt();
> + if (!table)
> + return -ENOENT;
> +
> + if (table->revision < 3)
> + return -ENOENT;
> +
> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> + acpi_cpu_id = get_acpi_id_for_cpu(cpu);
> + cpu_node = acpi_find_processor_node(table, acpi_cpu_id);
> + if (!cpu_node)
> + continue;
> +
> + /* Start at 1 for L1 */
> + level = 1;
> + cache = acpi_find_any_type_cache_node(table, acpi_cpu_id, level,
> + &cpu_node);
> + while (cache) {
> + cache_v1 = ACPI_ADD_PTR(struct acpi_pptt_cache_v1,
> + cache, sizeof(*cache));
> + if (!cache)
> + continue;
> +
> + cache_v1 = ACPI_ADD_PTR(struct acpi_pptt_cache_v1,
> + cache, sizeof(*cache));
> +
> + if (cache->flags & ACPI_PPTT_CACHE_ID_VALID &&
> + cache_v1->cache_id == cache_id)
> + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpus);
> +
> + level++;
Same comment as for the previous patch. You are bumping the level
without considering if there is another cache at that level.
> + cache = acpi_find_any_type_cache_node(table, acpi_cpu_id,
> + level, &cpu_node);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
Thanks,
Ben
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list