[PATCH v3 00/24] pmdomain: Add generic ->sync_state() support to genpd
Ulf Hansson
ulf.hansson at linaro.org
Wed Jul 30 03:29:13 PDT 2025
On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 at 11:56, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert at linux-m68k.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Ulf,
>
> On Wed, 9 Jul 2025 at 13:31, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson at linaro.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, 1 Jul 2025 at 13:47, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson at linaro.org> wrote:
> > > Changes in v3:
> > > - Added a couple of patches to adress problems on some Renesas
> > > platforms. Thanks Geert and Tomi for helping out!
> > > - Adressed a few comments from Saravanna and Konrad.
> > > - Added some tested-by tags.
> >
> > I decided it was time to give this a try, so I have queued this up for
> > v6.17 via the next branch at my pmdomain tree.
> >
> > If you encounter any issues, please let me know so I can help to fix them.
>
> Thanks for your series! Due to holidays, I only managed to test
> this very recently.
>
> Unfortunately I have an issue with unused PM Domains no longer being
> disabled on R-Car:
> - On R-Car Gen1/2/3, using rcar-sysc.c, unused PM Domains are never
> disabled.
> - On R-Car Gen4, using rcar-gen4-sysc.c, unused PM Domains are
> sometimes not disabled.
> At first, I noticed the IOMMU driver was not enabled in my config,
> and enabling it did fix the issue. However, after that I still
> encountered the issue in a different config that does have the
> IOMMU driver enabled...
>
> FTR, unused PM Domains are still disabled correctly on R/SH-Mobile
> (using rmobile-sysc.c) and on BeagleBone Black. Note that these use
> of_genpd_add_provider_simple(), while all R-Car drivers use
> of_genpd_add_provider_onecell(). Perhaps there is an issue with
> the latter? If you don't have a clue, I plan to do some more
> investigation later...
Geert, thanks for reporting!
>
> BTW, the "pending due to"-messages look weird to me.
> On R-Car M2-W (r8a7791.dtsi) I see e.g.:
>
> genpd_provider ca15-cpu0: sync_state() pending due to e6020000.watchdog
> renesas-cpg-mssr e6150000.clock-controller: sync_state() pending
> due to e6020000.watchdog
>
> ca15-cpu0 is the PM Domain holding the first CPU core, while
> the watchdog resides in the always-on Clock Domain, and uses the
> clock-controller for PM_CLK handling.
I will have a closer look as soon as I can to see if I can find some
potential problems.
Kind regards
Uffe
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list