[PATCH v3 04/10] dt-bindings: pinctrl: samsung: Add compatible for ARTPEC-8 SoC

[Ravi Patel]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk at kernel.org>
> Sent: 01 September 2025 10:42
> To: Ravi Patel <ravi.patel at samsung.com>; jesper.nilsson at axis.com; mturquette at baylibre.com; sboyd at kernel.org; robh at kernel.org;
> krzk+dt at kernel.org; conor+dt at kernel.org; s.nawrocki at samsung.com; cw00.choi at samsung.com; alim.akhtar at samsung.com;
> linus.walleij at linaro.org; tomasz.figa at gmail.com; catalin.marinas at arm.com; will at kernel.org; arnd at arndb.de
> Cc: ksk4725 at coasia.com; kenkim at coasia.com; pjsin865 at coasia.com; gwk1013 at coasia.com; hgkim05 at coasia.com;
> mingyoungbo at coasia.com; smn1196 at coasia.com; pankaj.dubey at samsung.com; shradha.t at samsung.com; inbaraj.e at samsung.com;
> swathi.ks at samsung.com; hrishikesh.d at samsung.com; dj76.yang at samsung.com; hypmean.kim at samsung.com; linux-
> kernel at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux-samsung-soc at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel at axis.com; linux-
> clk at vger.kernel.org; devicetree at vger.kernel.org; linux-gpio at vger.kernel.org; soc at lists.linux.dev
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/10] dt-bindings: pinctrl: samsung: Add compatible for ARTPEC-8 SoC
> 
> On 01/09/2025 05:41, Ravi Patel wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk at kernel.org>
> >> Sent: 31 August 2025 18:55
> >> To: Ravi Patel <ravi.patel at samsung.com>; jesper.nilsson at axis.com; mturquette at baylibre.com; sboyd at kernel.org; robh at kernel.org;
> >> krzk+dt at kernel.org; conor+dt at kernel.org; s.nawrocki at samsung.com; cw00.choi at samsung.com; alim.akhtar at samsung.com;
> >> linus.walleij at linaro.org; tomasz.figa at gmail.com; catalin.marinas at arm.com; will at kernel.org; arnd at arndb.de
> >> Cc: ksk4725 at coasia.com; kenkim at coasia.com; pjsin865 at coasia.com; gwk1013 at coasia.com; hgkim05 at coasia.com;
> >> mingyoungbo at coasia.com; smn1196 at coasia.com; pankaj.dubey at samsung.com; shradha.t at samsung.com; inbaraj.e at samsung.com;
> >> swathi.ks at samsung.com; hrishikesh.d at samsung.com; dj76.yang at samsung.com; hypmean.kim at samsung.com; linux-
> >> kernel at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux-samsung-soc at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel at axis.com; linux-
> >> clk at vger.kernel.org; devicetree at vger.kernel.org; linux-gpio at vger.kernel.org; soc at lists.linux.dev
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/10] dt-bindings: pinctrl: samsung: Add compatible for ARTPEC-8 SoC
> >>
> >> On 25/08/2025 13:44, Ravi Patel wrote:
> >>> From: SeonGu Kang <ksk4725 at coasia.com>
> >>>
> >>> Document the compatible string for ARTPEC-8 SoC pinctrl block,
> >>> which is similar to other Samsung SoC pinctrl blocks.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: SeonGu Kang <ksk4725 at coasia.com>
> >>> Acked-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh at kernel.org>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Ravi Patel <ravi.patel at samsung.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/samsung,pinctrl.yaml | 1 +
> >>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >>
> >>
> >> No wakeup-eint interrupts here? samsung,pinctrl-wakeup-interrupt.yaml?
> >
> > I don't see any use case for external wake-up interrupt here (as of now).
> 
> It is more about hardware, not use case. Does this hardware has EINT
> wakeup pin banks?

I checked SFR sheet, ARTPEC-8 does not have any EINT wakeup pins or SFRs.

Thanks,
Ravi

> 
> > So wakeup-eint entry is not present in dts and yaml both.
> 
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof