[PATCH v2 3/3] dt-bindings: thermal: rockchip: tighten grf requirements
Conor Dooley
conor at kernel.org
Wed Aug 20 12:48:23 PDT 2025
On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 07:40:49PM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> Instead of having an optional rockchip,grf property, forbid using it on
> platforms without registers in a GRF being needed for thermal monitoring
> and make it mandatory on the platforms actually needing it.
I am assuming that "needing it" means that it was actually mandatory but
the binding was just missing the required required entry. If so
Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley at microchip.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel at collabora.com>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/thermal/rockchip-thermal.yaml | 15 +++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/rockchip-thermal.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/rockchip-thermal.yaml
> index 573f447cc26ed7100638277598b0e745d436fd01..9fa5c4c49d76e3a689f31797875124e7fb30d3df 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/rockchip-thermal.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/rockchip-thermal.yaml
> @@ -119,6 +119,21 @@ required:
> - resets
>
> allOf:
> + - if:
> + properties:
> + compatible:
> + contains:
> + enum:
> + - rockchip,px30-tsadc
> + - rockchip,rk3366-tsadc
> + - rockchip,rk3399-tsadc
> + - rockchip,rk3568-tsadc
> + then:
> + required:
> + - rockchip,grf
> + else:
> + properties:
> + rockchip,grf: false
> - if:
> not:
> properties:
>
> --
> 2.50.1
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20250820/ee97057f/attachment.sig>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list