[RESEND v3 1/5] PCI: dwc: Don't poll L2 if QUIRK_NOL2POLL_IN_PM is existing in suspend

[Bjorn Helgaas]

On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 03:32:01PM +0800, Richard Zhu wrote:
> Refer to PCIe r6.0, sec 5.2, fig 5-1 Link Power Management State Flow
> Diagram. Both L0 and L2/L3 Ready can be transferred to LDn directly.
> 
> It's harmless to let dw_pcie_suspend_noirq() proceed suspend after the
> PME_Turn_Off is sent out, whatever the LTSSM state is in L2 or L3 after
> a recommended 10ms max wait refer to PCIe r6.0, sec 5.3.3.2.1 PME
> Synchronization.
> 
> The LTSSM states are inaccessible on i.MX6QP and i.MX7D after the
> PME_Turn_Off is sent out.
> 
> To support this case, don't poll L2 state and apply a simple delay of
> PCIE_PME_TO_L2_TIMEOUT_US(10ms) if the QUIRK_NOL2POLL_IN_PM flag is set
> in suspend.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu at nxp.com>
> Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li at nxp.com>
> ---
>  .../pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c | 31 +++++++++++++------
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h  |  4 +++
>  2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> index 952f8594b5012..20a7f827babbf 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> @@ -1007,7 +1007,7 @@ int dw_pcie_suspend_noirq(struct dw_pcie *pci)
>  {
>  	u8 offset = dw_pcie_find_capability(pci, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP);
>  	u32 val;
> -	int ret;
> +	int ret = 0;
>  
>       /*
>        * If L1SS is supported, then do not put the link into L2 as some
         * devices such as NVMe expect low resume latency.
         */
         if (dw_pcie_readw_dbi(pci, offset + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL) & PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_ASPM_L1)
                return 0;

You didn't change it in this patch (the L1SS test was added by
4774faf854f5 ("PCI: dwc: Implement generic suspend/resume
functionality")), but this L1SS check is an encapsulation problem.
The ASPM configuration shouldn't leak out here in such an ad hoc way.

*All* drivers, not just NVMe, would prefer low resume latency.

How do we deal with this in other host controller drivers?  If any
other driver puts links in L2, I suppose they would have the same
issue?  Maybe DWC is the only one that puts the link in L2?

What happens when we add a new driver that puts links in L2?  I guess
we'll be debugging some NVMe issue again?

Bjorn