[PATCH v2 2/2] Add dp PHY dt-bindings

LIANKUN YANG (杨连坤) Liankun.Yang at mediatek.com
Mon May 13 21:43:03 PDT 2024


On Mon, 2024-05-13 at 16:20 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>  	 
> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
> you have verified the sender or the content.
>  On 13/05/2024 16:17, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >>> dp.yaml
> >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
> >>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> >>>> +%YAML 1.2
> >>>> +---
> >>>> +$id: 
> >>> 
> http://devicetree.org/schemas/display/mediatek/mediatek,phy-dp.yaml#
> >>>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> >>>> +
> >>>> +title: MediaTek Display Port Controller
> >>>> +
> >>>> +maintainers:
> >>>> +  - Mac shen <mac.shen at mediatek.com>
> >>>> +  - Liankun yang <Liankun.yang at mediatek.com>
> >>>> +
> >>>> +description: |
> >>>> +  Special settings need to be configured by MediaTek DP based
> on
> >>> the actual
> >>>> +  hardware situation. For example, when using a certain brand's
> >>> docking
> >>>> +  station for display projection, garbage may appear. Adjusting
> >>> the specific
> >>>> +  ssc value can resolve this issue.
> >>>> +
> >>>> +properties:
> >>>> +  status: disabled
> >>>
> >>> I think you nicely shocked Rob already.
> >>>
> >>> Please reach internally to Mediatek or collaborating companies to
> get
> >>> basic training and instructions how to write patches and
> bindings.
> >>>
> >>> Otherwise it is waste of our time. Mediatek is not a small
> company so
> >>> there is no excuse in sending such poor quality patches, which
> would
> >>> be
> >>> EASILY spotted by the MOST BASIC review.
> >>>
> >>> Best regards,
> >>> Krzysztof
> >>>
> >>
> >> I used scripts/checkpatch.pl and fix reported error and warnings.
> >> I am resumbmitting bindings by the MOST BASIC review.
> > 
> > No, please wait. Who did the basic review of your patch? Who from
> > Mediatek? Upstream is not a workhorse to use instead of your
> resources
> > for the absolute basic stuff... This feels such exploiting.
> > 
> 
> After reading AngeloGioacchino's response, it looks even worse...
> This
> was never tested...
> 
> So not only exploiting but also feels like wasting our time.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 


Sorry,I guess I didn't make myself clear.
I am resumbmitting bindings after the MOST BASIC internal review.
Thank you for your comment.

Best Regards,
Liankun Yang





More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list