[PATCH v4 2/6] arm64: dts: rockchip: enable thermal management on all RK3588 boards

[Diederik de Haas]

Hi,

On Monday, 6 May 2024 11:36:33 CEST Alexey Charkov wrote:
> This enables the on-chip thermal monitoring sensor (TSADC) on all
> RK3588(s) boards that don't have it enabled yet. It provides temperature
> monitoring for the SoC and emergency thermal shutdowns, and is thus
> important to have in place before CPU DVFS is enabled, as high CPU
> operating performance points can overheat the chip quickly in the
> absence of thermal management.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Charkov <alchark at gmail.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-rock-5b.dts               | 4 ++++
>  8 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-rock-5b.dts
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-rock-5b.dts index
> b8e15b76a8a6..21e96c212dd8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-rock-5b.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-rock-5b.dts
> @@ -742,6 +742,10 @@ regulator-state-mem {
>  	};
>  };
> 
> +&tsadc {
> +	status = "okay";
> +};
> +
>  &uart2 {
>  	pinctrl-0 = <&uart2m0_xfer>;
>  	status = "okay";

I built a kernel with v3 of your patch set and someone tested it on a ROCK 5B 
'for me' and it had the following line in dmesg:

rockchip-thermal fec00000.tsadc: Missing rockchip,grf property

I'm guessing that turned up due to enabling tsadc, but (also) in v4 I didn't 
see a change wrt "rockchip,grf".
Should that be done? (asking; I don't know)

Cheers,
  Diederik
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20240506/1906e118/attachment.sig>