[PATCH v3 1/3] arm64/mm: Refactor PMD_PRESENT_INVALID and PTE_PROT_NONE bits
Anshuman Khandual
anshuman.khandual at arm.com
Wed May 1 22:26:17 PDT 2024
On 5/1/24 20:24, Ryan Roberts wrote:
> Currently the PMD_PRESENT_INVALID and PTE_PROT_NONE functionality
> explicitly occupy 2 bits in the PTE when PTE_VALID/PMD_SECT_VALID is
> clear. This has 2 significant consequences:
>
> - PTE_PROT_NONE consumes a precious SW PTE bit that could be used for
> other things.
> - The swap pte layout must reserve those same 2 bits and ensure they
> are both always zero for a swap pte. It would be nice to reclaim at
> least one of those bits.
What problem does that create for swap pte layout ? Nonetheless reclaiming
at least one of the SW bits (58 or 59) would be desirable regardless.
>
> Note that while PMD_PRESENT_INVALID technically only applies to pmds,
> the swap pte layout is common to ptes and pmds so we are currently
> effectively reserving that bit at both levels.
Agreed.
>
> Let's replace PMD_PRESENT_INVALID with a more generic
> PTE_PRESENT_INVALID bit, which occupies the same position (bit 59) but
> applies uniformly to page/block descriptors at any level. This bit is
> only interpreted when PTE_VALID is clear. If it is set, then the pte is
> still considered present; pte_present() returns true and all the fields
> in the pte follow the HW interpretation (e.g. SW can safely call
> pte_pfn(), etc). But crucially, the HW treats the pte as invalid and
> will fault if it hits.
Agreed, and hence all pmd helpers could be derived from corresponding pte
helper utilizing PTE_PRESENT_INVALID.
>
> With this in place, we can remove PTE_PROT_NONE entirely and instead
> represent PROT_NONE as a present but invalid pte (PTE_VALID=0,
> PTE_INVALID=1) with PTE_USER=0 and PTE_UXN=1. This is a unique
Did you mean PTE_PRESENT_INVALID instead ? PTE_INVALID flag is not present
on arm64 platform, although your point is clear.
> combination that is not used anywhere else.
But how did we arrive at the conclusion that the following combination for
PROT_NONE replacement is optimum and would not create problem in any other
core MM path ?
PTE_PRESENT_INVALID = 1
PTE_VALID = 0
PTE_USER = 0
PTE_UXN = 1
>
> The net result is a clearer, simpler, more generic encoding scheme that
> applies uniformly to all levels. Additionally we free up a PTE SW bit
> and a swap pte bit (bit 58 in both cases).
>
> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas at arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts at arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h | 11 ++----
> arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 50 +++++++++++++++------------
> 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h
> index dd9ee67d1d87..cd8c06f5fb02 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h
> @@ -18,14 +18,7 @@
> #define PTE_DIRTY (_AT(pteval_t, 1) << 55)
> #define PTE_SPECIAL (_AT(pteval_t, 1) << 56)
> #define PTE_DEVMAP (_AT(pteval_t, 1) << 57)
> -#define PTE_PROT_NONE (_AT(pteval_t, 1) << 58) /* only when !PTE_VALID */
> -
> -/*
> - * This bit indicates that the entry is present i.e. pmd_page()
> - * still points to a valid huge page in memory even if the pmd
> - * has been invalidated.
> - */
This comment should be retained after making it bit generic so that
it can be used for both pte and pmd.
> -#define PMD_PRESENT_INVALID (_AT(pteval_t, 1) << 59) /* only when !PMD_SECT_VALID */
> +#define PTE_PRESENT_INVALID (_AT(pteval_t, 1) << 59) /* only when !PTE_VALID */
>
> #define _PROT_DEFAULT (PTE_TYPE_PAGE | PTE_AF | PTE_SHARED)
> #define _PROT_SECT_DEFAULT (PMD_TYPE_SECT | PMD_SECT_AF | PMD_SECT_S)
> @@ -103,7 +96,7 @@ static inline bool __pure lpa2_is_enabled(void)
> __val; \
> })
>
> -#define PAGE_NONE __pgprot(((_PAGE_DEFAULT) & ~PTE_VALID) | PTE_PROT_NONE | PTE_RDONLY | PTE_NG | PTE_PXN | PTE_UXN)
> +#define PAGE_NONE __pgprot(((_PAGE_DEFAULT) & ~PTE_VALID) | PTE_PRESENT_INVALID | PTE_RDONLY | PTE_NG | PTE_PXN | PTE_UXN)
> /* shared+writable pages are clean by default, hence PTE_RDONLY|PTE_WRITE */
> #define PAGE_SHARED __pgprot(_PAGE_SHARED)
> #define PAGE_SHARED_EXEC __pgprot(_PAGE_SHARED_EXEC)
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> index afdd56d26ad7..c0f4471423db 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ static inline pteval_t __phys_to_pte_val(phys_addr_t phys)
> /*
> * The following only work if pte_present(). Undefined behaviour otherwise.
> */
> -#define pte_present(pte) (!!(pte_val(pte) & (PTE_VALID | PTE_PROT_NONE)))
> +#define pte_present(pte) (pte_valid(pte) || pte_present_invalid(pte))
> #define pte_young(pte) (!!(pte_val(pte) & PTE_AF))
> #define pte_special(pte) (!!(pte_val(pte) & PTE_SPECIAL))
> #define pte_write(pte) (!!(pte_val(pte) & PTE_WRITE))
> @@ -132,6 +132,8 @@ static inline pteval_t __phys_to_pte_val(phys_addr_t phys)
> #define pte_dirty(pte) (pte_sw_dirty(pte) || pte_hw_dirty(pte))
>
> #define pte_valid(pte) (!!(pte_val(pte) & PTE_VALID))
> +#define pte_present_invalid(pte) \
> + ((pte_val(pte) & (PTE_VALID | PTE_PRESENT_INVALID)) == PTE_PRESENT_INVALID)
> /*
> * Execute-only user mappings do not have the PTE_USER bit set. All valid
> * kernel mappings have the PTE_UXN bit set.
> @@ -261,6 +263,13 @@ static inline pte_t pte_mkpresent(pte_t pte)
> return set_pte_bit(pte, __pgprot(PTE_VALID));
> }
>
> +static inline pte_t pte_mkinvalid(pte_t pte)
> +{
> + pte = set_pte_bit(pte, __pgprot(PTE_PRESENT_INVALID));
> + pte = clear_pte_bit(pte, __pgprot(PTE_VALID));
> + return pte;
> +}
> +
> static inline pmd_t pmd_mkcont(pmd_t pmd)
> {
> return __pmd(pmd_val(pmd) | PMD_SECT_CONT);
> @@ -469,7 +478,16 @@ static inline pte_t pte_swp_clear_exclusive(pte_t pte)
> */
> static inline int pte_protnone(pte_t pte)
> {
> - return (pte_val(pte) & (PTE_VALID | PTE_PROT_NONE)) == PTE_PROT_NONE;
> + /*
> + * pte_present_invalid() tells us that the pte is invalid from HW
> + * perspective but present from SW perspective, so the fields are to be
> + * interpretted as per the HW layout. The second 2 checks are the unique
> + * encoding that we use for PROT_NONE. It is insufficient to only use
> + * the first check because we share the same encoding scheme with pmds
> + * which support pmd_mkinvalid(), so can be present-invalid without
> + * being PROT_NONE.
> + */
> + return pte_present_invalid(pte) && !pte_user(pte) && !pte_user_exec(pte);
> }
>
> static inline int pmd_protnone(pmd_t pmd)
> @@ -478,12 +496,7 @@ static inline int pmd_protnone(pmd_t pmd)
> }
> #endif
>
> -#define pmd_present_invalid(pmd) (!!(pmd_val(pmd) & PMD_PRESENT_INVALID))
> -
> -static inline int pmd_present(pmd_t pmd)
> -{
> - return pte_present(pmd_pte(pmd)) || pmd_present_invalid(pmd);
> -}
> +#define pmd_present(pmd) pte_present(pmd_pte(pmd))
>
> /*
> * THP definitions.
> @@ -508,14 +521,7 @@ static inline int pmd_trans_huge(pmd_t pmd)
> #define pmd_mkclean(pmd) pte_pmd(pte_mkclean(pmd_pte(pmd)))
> #define pmd_mkdirty(pmd) pte_pmd(pte_mkdirty(pmd_pte(pmd)))
> #define pmd_mkyoung(pmd) pte_pmd(pte_mkyoung(pmd_pte(pmd)))
> -
> -static inline pmd_t pmd_mkinvalid(pmd_t pmd)
> -{
> - pmd = set_pmd_bit(pmd, __pgprot(PMD_PRESENT_INVALID));
> - pmd = clear_pmd_bit(pmd, __pgprot(PMD_SECT_VALID));
> -
> - return pmd;
> -}
> +#define pmd_mkinvalid(pmd) pte_pmd(pte_mkinvalid(pmd_pte(pmd)))
>
> #define pmd_thp_or_huge(pmd) (pmd_huge(pmd) || pmd_trans_huge(pmd))
>
> @@ -1027,8 +1033,8 @@ static inline pte_t pte_modify(pte_t pte, pgprot_t newprot)
> * in MAIR_EL1. The mask below has to include PTE_ATTRINDX_MASK.
> */
> const pteval_t mask = PTE_USER | PTE_PXN | PTE_UXN | PTE_RDONLY |
> - PTE_PROT_NONE | PTE_VALID | PTE_WRITE | PTE_GP |
> - PTE_ATTRINDX_MASK;
> + PTE_PRESENT_INVALID | PTE_VALID | PTE_WRITE |
> + PTE_GP | PTE_ATTRINDX_MASK;
> /* preserve the hardware dirty information */
> if (pte_hw_dirty(pte))
> pte = set_pte_bit(pte, __pgprot(PTE_DIRTY));
> @@ -1076,17 +1082,17 @@ static inline int pgd_devmap(pgd_t pgd)
> #ifdef CONFIG_PAGE_TABLE_CHECK
> static inline bool pte_user_accessible_page(pte_t pte)
> {
> - return pte_present(pte) && (pte_user(pte) || pte_user_exec(pte));
> + return pte_valid(pte) && (pte_user(pte) || pte_user_exec(pte));
Previously pte_present() checked against both PTE_VALID and PTE_PROT_NONE
but now it only compares against PTE_VALID instead. But how would it detect
erstwhile PTE_PROT_NONE marked entries ?
> }
>
> static inline bool pmd_user_accessible_page(pmd_t pmd)
> {
> - return pmd_leaf(pmd) && !pmd_present_invalid(pmd) && (pmd_user(pmd) || pmd_user_exec(pmd));
> + return pmd_valid(pmd) && !pmd_table(pmd) && (pmd_user(pmd) || pmd_user_exec(pmd));
> }
>
> static inline bool pud_user_accessible_page(pud_t pud)
> {
> - return pud_leaf(pud) && (pud_user(pud) || pud_user_exec(pud));
> + return pud_valid(pud) && !pud_table(pud) && (pud_user(pud) || pud_user_exec(pud));
> }
These make sense.
> #endif
>
> @@ -1250,7 +1256,7 @@ static inline pmd_t pmdp_establish(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> * bits 2: remember PG_anon_exclusive
> * bits 3-7: swap type
> * bits 8-57: swap offset
> - * bit 58: PTE_PROT_NONE (must be zero)
> + * bit 59: PTE_PRESENT_INVALID (must be zero)
> */
> #define __SWP_TYPE_SHIFT 3
> #define __SWP_TYPE_BITS 5
Too many changes are happening simultaneously in a single patch, making
some what difficult to review, and it would be helpful to refactor them
possibly something like the following -
Derive pmd_present_invalid() from pte level with PTE_PRESENT_INVALID
- Renaming PMD_PRESENT_INVALID as PTE_PRESENT_INVALID
- Add pte_mkinvalid()
- Add pte_present_invalid()
- Derive pmd_mkinvalid() from pte_mkinvalid()
- Derive pmd_present_invalid() from pte_present() and pte_present_invalid()
- But just don't change pte_present() yet
Drop PTE_PROT_NONE
- Replace PTE_PROT_NONE with PTE_PRESENT_INVALID in PAGE_NONE
- Change pte_present() - derive from pte_valid() and pte_present_invalid()
- Derive pmd_present() - derive from pte_present()
- Change pte_protnone() - derive from pte_present_invalid(), pte_user() and pte_user_exec()
- Changes to pte_user_accessible_page(), pmd_user_accessible_page(), pud_user_accessible_page()
- Changes to pte_modify() - replace PTE_PROT_NONE with PTE_PRESENT_INVALID
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list