[PATCH v2] ARM: Add support for STACKLEAK gcc plugin

[Kees Cook]

On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 03:53:14PM +0800, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2024/6/24 15:30, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 4:33 AM Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie at huawei.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> Add the STACKLEAK gcc plugin to arm32 by adding the helper used by
> >> stackleak common code: on_thread_stack(). It initialize the stack with the
> >> poison value before returning from system calls which improves the kernel
> >> security. Additionally, this disables the plugin in EFI stub code and
> >> decompress code, which are out of scope for the protection.
> >>
> >> Before the test on Qemu versatilepb board:
> >>         # echo STACKLEAK_ERASING  > /sys/kernel/debug/provoke-crash/DIRECT
> >>         lkdtm: Performing direct entry STACKLEAK_ERASING
> >>         lkdtm: XFAIL: stackleak is not supported on this arch (HAVE_ARCH_STACKLEAK=n)
> >>
> >> After:
> >>         # echo STACKLEAK_ERASING  > /sys/kernel/debug/provoke-crash/DIRECT
> >>         lkdtm: Performing direct entry STACKLEAK_ERASING
> >>         lkdtm: stackleak stack usage:
> >>           high offset: 80 bytes
> >>           current:     280 bytes
> >>           lowest:      696 bytes
> >>           tracked:     696 bytes
> >>           untracked:   192 bytes
> >>           poisoned:    7220 bytes
> >>           low offset:  4 bytes
> >>         lkdtm: OK: the rest of the thread stack is properly erased
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie at huawei.com>
> >> Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb at kernel.org>
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij at linaro.org>
> > 
> > I was digging around to see if this would interfere with BPF
> > trampolines, but the
> > BPF code seems so generic that I assume it already takes stackleak into account.
> > 
> Thank you very much, as Kees said, can this patch go via
> rmk's patch tracker now?

Probably yes (we have some reviews now). Please go ahead and add it there.

-- 
Kees Cook