[PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: clock: airoha: Add reset support to EN7581 clock binding
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
angelogioacchino.delregno at collabora.com
Thu Jun 27 03:03:38 PDT 2024
Il 27/06/24 11:57, Conor Dooley ha scritto:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 11:53:00AM +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>> Il 27/06/24 11:47, Conor Dooley ha scritto:
>>> On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 11:33:47AM +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>>>> Il 13/06/24 14:47, Lorenzo Bianconi ha scritto:
>>>>> Introduce reset capability to EN7581 device-tree clock binding
>>>>> documentation.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo at kernel.org>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> .../bindings/clock/airoha,en7523-scu.yaml | 25 ++++++-
>>>>> .../dt-bindings/reset/airoha,en7581-reset.h | 66 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> 2 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/reset/airoha,en7581-reset.h
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/airoha,en7523-scu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/airoha,en7523-scu.yaml
>>>>> index 3f4266637733..84353fd09428 100644
>>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/airoha,en7523-scu.yaml
>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/airoha,en7523-scu.yaml
>>>>> @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ properties:
>>>>> reg:
>>>>> minItems: 2
>>>>> - maxItems: 3
>>>>> + maxItems: 4
>>>>> "#clock-cells":
>>>>> description:
>>>>> @@ -43,6 +43,10 @@ properties:
>>>>> clocks.
>>>>> const: 1
>>>>> + '#reset-cells':
>>>>> + description: ID of the controller reset line
>>>>> + const: 1
>>>>> +
>>>>> required:
>>>>> - compatible
>>>>> - reg
>>>>> @@ -60,6 +64,8 @@ allOf:
>>>>> - description: scu base address
>>>>> - description: misc scu base address
>>>>> + '#reset-cells': false
>>>>> +
>>>>> - if:
>>>>> properties:
>>>>> compatible:
>>>>> @@ -70,6 +76,7 @@ allOf:
>>>>> items:
>>>>> - description: scu base address
>>>>> - description: misc scu base address
>>>>> + - description: reset base address
>>>>
>>>> Are you sure that the indentation is correct? :-)
>>>>
>>>> After fixing the indentation,
>>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno at collabora.com>
>>>>
>>>>> - description: pb scu base address
>>>
>>> The indentation actually looks okay when I apply this locally, but how is
>>> it backwards compatible to add this register in the middle of the list??
>>
>> It's not, and this is actually something done on purpose - there is no DT using
>> this binding yet (here, nor uboot), and Lorenzo acknowledged the mistake before
>> it was too late...
>>
>> At least this time, it wasn't a misattention :-P
>
> The rationale for this being okay really should be in the commit
> message...
>
>> Btw, as far as I know, the reset base address is in between misc scu and pb scu,
>> that's why it was put there in the middle.
>
> ...but I don't really see why this needs to be done incompatibly at all
> in the first place. Just put it at the end of the list, there's no rule
> that the order of reg properties needs to match the MMIO addresses.
>
It's just a perfection thing... but whatever, if that's unacceptable for you,
putting it at the end of the list isn't a huge deal anyway.
Your call - it's okay for me either way.
Cheers,
Angelo
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list