[PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: net: qcom: ethernet: Add interconnect properties

Andrew Halaney ahalaney at redhat.com
Wed Jun 26 07:53:16 PDT 2024


On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 04:49:28PM GMT, Sagar Cheluvegowda wrote:
> Add documentation for the interconnect and interconnect-names
> properties required when voting for AHB and AXI buses.
> 
> Suggested-by: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney at redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sagar Cheluvegowda <quic_scheluve at quicinc.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qcom,ethqos.yaml | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qcom,ethqos.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qcom,ethqos.yaml
> index 6672327358bc..b7e2644bfb18 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qcom,ethqos.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qcom,ethqos.yaml
> @@ -63,6 +63,14 @@ properties:
>  

Does it make sense to make these changes in snps,dwmac.yaml since you're
trying to do this generically for stmmac? I don't poke bindings super
often so might be a silly question, the inheritance of snps,dwmac.yaml
into the various platform specific bindings (qcom,ethqos.yaml) would
then let you define it once in the snps,dwmac.yaml right?

>    dma-coherent: true
>  
> +  interconnects:
> +    maxItems: 2
> +
> +  interconnect-names:
> +    items:
> +      - const: axi
> +      - const: ahb

Sorry to bikeshed, and with Krzysztof's review on this already its
probably unnecessary, but would names like cpu-mac and mac-mem be
more generic / appropriate? I see that sort of convention a lot in the
other bindings, and to me those read really well and are understandable.




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list