[PATCH v2 0/5] arm64: irqchip/gic-v3: Use compiletime constant PMR values

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Fri, Jun 21 2024 at 18:26, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 12:18:36PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
>> Mark Rutland (5):
>>   wordpart.h: Add REPEAT_BYTE_U32()
>>   irqchip/gic-common: Remove sync_access callback
>>   irqchip/gic-v3: Make distributor priorities variables
>>   irqchip/gic-v3: Detect GICD_CTRL.DS and SCR_EL3.FIQ earlier
>>   arm64: irqchip/gic-v3: Select priorities at boot time
>> 
>>  arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h     |  15 --
>>  arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h         |  35 +---
>>  arch/arm64/kernel/image-vars.h          |   5 -
>>  drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-common.c        |  22 +--
>>  drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-common.h        |   7 +-
>>  drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c        |  11 +-
>>  drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c            | 225 ++++++++++++------------
>>  drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c               |  10 +-
>>  drivers/irqchip/irq-hip04.c             |   6 +-
>>  include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-common.h  |   4 -
>>  include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3-prio.h |  52 ++++++
>>  include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h      |   2 +-
>>  include/linux/wordpart.h                |   8 +
>>  13 files changed, 201 insertions(+), 201 deletions(-)
>>  create mode 100644 include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3-prio.h
>
> Are you ok for these patches to go through the arm64 tree (I can put
> them on a stable branch) or you'd rather get them through the irqchip
> tree? Either way, I don't expect (major) conflicts with the arm64 tree.

Take them through your tree with my Acked-by. Yes a branch would be
appreciated just in case.

There is also

      https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240529133446.28446-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com

which fiddles with the GIC but most of this is not irqchip code. No idea
how that is supposed to find it's way into the tree.

Thanks,

        tglx