[PATCH v2 net-next 2/2] net: airoha: Introduce ethernet support for EN7581 SoC

[Lorenzo Bianconi]

> > +static void airoha_fe_maccr_init(struct airoha_eth *eth)
> > +{
> 
> ...
> 
> > +	airoha_fe_wr(eth, REG_FE_VIP_PATN(11), 0xc057); /* PPP->IPv6CP (0xc057) */
> 
> include/uapi/linux/ppp_defs.h
> #define PPP_IPV6CP      0x8057  /* IPv6 Control Protocol */
> 
> Are these the same thing? Why is there one bit difference?

ack, I guess there is a typo here.

> 
> 
> > +	airoha_fe_wr(eth, REG_FE_VIP_PATN(17), 0x1ae0);
> > +	airoha_fe_wr(eth, REG_FE_VIP_EN(17),
> > +		     PATN_FCPU_EN_MASK | PATN_SP_EN_MASK |
> > +		     FIELD_PREP(PATN_TYPE_MASK, 3) | PATN_EN_MASK);
> > +
> > +	airoha_fe_wr(eth, REG_FE_VIP_PATN(18), 0x1ae00000);
> > +	airoha_fe_wr(eth, REG_FE_VIP_EN(18),
> > +		     PATN_FCPU_EN_MASK | PATN_DP_EN_MASK |
> > +		     FIELD_PREP(PATN_TYPE_MASK, 3) | PATN_EN_MASK);
> 
> > +	airoha_fe_wr(eth, REG_FE_VIP_PATN(22), 0xaaaa);
> 
> Please add a comment what these match.

ack, I will look into them.

> 
> > +static int airoha_dev_change_mtu(struct net_device *dev, int new_mtu)
> > +{
> > +	dev->mtu = new_mtu;
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> 
> I don't think this is needed. Look at __dev_set_mtu().

ack, I will get rid of it in v3.

Regards,
Lorenzo

> 
>     Andrew
> 
> ---
> pw-bot: cr
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20240619/3f175396/attachment.sig>