[PATCH v3 4/5] firmware: imx: add driver for NXP EdgeLock Enclave
Sascha Hauer
s.hauer at pengutronix.de
Tue Jun 18 01:31:57 PDT 2024
Hi Pankaj,
Here's some review feedback. I think it'll take some more rounds to get
this into shape.
On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 12:59:42PM +0530, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> NXP hardware IP(s) for secure-enclaves like Edgelock Enclave(ELE),
> are embedded in the SoC to support the features like HSM, SHE & V2X,
> using message based communication interface.
>
> The secure enclave FW communicates on a dedicated messaging unit(MU)
> based interface(s) with application core, where kernel is running.
> It exists on specific i.MX processors. e.g. i.MX8ULP, i.MX93.
>
> This patch adds the driver for communication interface to secure-enclave,
> for exchanging messages with NXP secure enclave HW IP(s) like EdgeLock
> Enclave (ELE) from Kernel-space, used by kernel management layers like
> - DM-Crypt.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta at nxp.com>
> ---
> drivers/firmware/imx/Kconfig | 12 +
> drivers/firmware/imx/Makefile | 2 +
> drivers/firmware/imx/ele_base_msg.c | 284 +++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/firmware/imx/ele_base_msg.h | 90 ++++++
> drivers/firmware/imx/ele_common.c | 233 ++++++++++++++++
> drivers/firmware/imx/ele_common.h | 45 +++
> drivers/firmware/imx/se_ctrl.c | 536 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/firmware/imx/se_ctrl.h | 99 +++++++
> include/linux/firmware/imx/se_api.h | 14 +
> 9 files changed, 1315 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/imx/Kconfig b/drivers/firmware/imx/Kconfig
> index 183613f82a11..56bdca9bd917 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/imx/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/imx/Kconfig
> @@ -22,3 +22,15 @@ config IMX_SCU
>
> This driver manages the IPC interface between host CPU and the
> SCU firmware running on M4.
> +
> +config IMX_SEC_ENCLAVE
> + tristate "i.MX Embedded Secure Enclave - EdgeLock Enclave Firmware driver."
> + depends on IMX_MBOX && ARCH_MXC && ARM64
> + default m if ARCH_MXC
> +
> + help
> + It is possible to use APIs exposed by the iMX Secure Enclave HW IP called:
> + - EdgeLock Enclave Firmware (for i.MX8ULP, i.MX93),
> + like base, HSM, V2X & SHE using the SAB protocol via the shared Messaging
> + Unit. This driver exposes these interfaces via a set of file descriptors
> + allowing to configure shared memory, send and receive messages.
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/imx/Makefile b/drivers/firmware/imx/Makefile
> index 8f9f04a513a8..aa9033e0e9e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/imx/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/imx/Makefile
> @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> obj-$(CONFIG_IMX_DSP) += imx-dsp.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_IMX_SCU) += imx-scu.o misc.o imx-scu-irq.o rm.o imx-scu-soc.o
> +sec_enclave-objs = se_ctrl.o ele_common.o ele_base_msg.o
> +obj-${CONFIG_IMX_SEC_ENCLAVE} += sec_enclave.o
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/imx/ele_base_msg.c b/drivers/firmware/imx/ele_base_msg.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..5bfd9c7e3f7e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/imx/ele_base_msg.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,284 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> +/*
> + * Copyright 2024 NXP
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <linux/completion.h>
> +#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> +
> +#include "ele_base_msg.h"
> +#include "ele_common.h"
> +
> +int ele_get_info(struct device *dev, struct ele_dev_info *s_info)
> +{
I think all currently exported functions should take a struct se_if_priv
* as context pointer.
I can't find any place in which any of these functions is called
differently than with priv->dev.
> + struct se_if_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + struct se_api_msg *tx_msg __free(kfree) = NULL;
> + struct se_api_msg *rx_msg __free(kfree) = NULL;
> + phys_addr_t get_info_addr = 0;
> + u32 *get_info_data = NULL;
> + u32 status;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + memset(s_info, 0x0, sizeof(*s_info));
> +
> + if (priv->mem_pool_name)
> + get_info_data = get_phy_buf_mem_pool(dev,
> + priv->mem_pool_name,
> + &get_info_addr,
> + ELE_GET_INFO_BUFF_SZ);
> + else
> + get_info_data = dma_alloc_coherent(dev,
> + ELE_GET_INFO_BUFF_SZ,
> + &get_info_addr,
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!get_info_data) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + dev_dbg(dev,
> + "%s: Failed to allocate get_info_addr.\n",
> + __func__);
> + goto exit;
Just return here and you can drop the if(get_info_data) in the exit
path.
> + }
> +
> + tx_msg = kzalloc(ELE_GET_INFO_REQ_MSG_SZ, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!tx_msg) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto exit;
> + }
> +
> + rx_msg = kzalloc(ELE_GET_INFO_RSP_MSG_SZ, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!rx_msg) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto exit;
> + }
> +
> + ret = imx_se_fill_cmd_msg_hdr(priv,
> + (struct se_msg_hdr *)&tx_msg->header,
> + ELE_GET_INFO_REQ,
> + ELE_GET_INFO_REQ_MSG_SZ,
> + true);
> + if (ret)
> + goto exit;
> +
> + tx_msg->data[0] = upper_32_bits(get_info_addr);
> + tx_msg->data[1] = lower_32_bits(get_info_addr);
> + tx_msg->data[2] = sizeof(struct ele_dev_info);
Use sizeof(*s_info). It will increase the chance of doing the right
thing here on struct renames and such.
> + ret = imx_ele_msg_send_rcv(priv, tx_msg, rx_msg);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto exit;
> +
> + ret = validate_rsp_hdr(priv,
> + &priv->rx_msg->header,
> + ELE_GET_INFO_REQ,
> + ELE_GET_INFO_RSP_MSG_SZ,
> + true);
> + if (ret)
> + goto exit;
> +
> + status = RES_STATUS(priv->rx_msg->data[0]);
> + if (status != priv->success_tag) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Command Id[%d], Response Failure = 0x%x",
> + ELE_GET_INFO_REQ, status);
> + ret = -EPERM;
> + }
> +
> + memcpy(s_info, get_info_data, sizeof(struct ele_dev_info));
> +
> +exit:
> + if (get_info_addr) {
> + if (priv->mem_pool_name)
> + free_phybuf_mem_pool(dev, priv->mem_pool_name,
> + get_info_data, ELE_GET_INFO_BUFF_SZ);
> + else
> + dma_free_coherent(dev,
> + ELE_GET_INFO_BUFF_SZ,
> + get_info_data,
> + get_info_addr);
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +int ele_fetch_soc_info(struct device *dev, u16 *soc_rev, u64 *serial_num)
> +{
> + struct ele_dev_info s_info = {0};
> + int err = 0;
> +
> + err = ele_get_info(dev, &s_info);
> + if (err < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Error");
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + *soc_rev = s_info.d_info.soc_rev;
> + *serial_num = GET_SERIAL_NUM_FROM_UID(s_info.d_info.uid, MAX_UID_SIZE >> 2);
> +
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> +int ele_ping(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct se_if_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + struct se_api_msg *tx_msg __free(kfree) = NULL;
> + struct se_api_msg *rx_msg __free(kfree) = NULL;
> + u32 status;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + tx_msg = kzalloc(ELE_PING_REQ_SZ, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!tx_msg) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto exit;
> + }
> +
> + rx_msg = kzalloc(ELE_PING_RSP_SZ, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!rx_msg) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto exit;
> + }
> +
> + ret = imx_se_fill_cmd_msg_hdr(priv,
> + (struct se_msg_hdr *)&tx_msg->header,
> + ELE_PING_REQ, ELE_PING_REQ_SZ, true);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Error: imx_se_fill_cmd_msg_hdr failed.\n");
> + goto exit;
> + }
> +
> + ret = imx_ele_msg_send_rcv(priv, tx_msg, rx_msg);
> + if (ret)
> + goto exit;
> +
> + ret = validate_rsp_hdr(priv,
> + &priv->rx_msg->header,
> + ELE_PING_REQ,
> + ELE_PING_RSP_SZ,
> + true);
> + if (ret)
> + goto exit;
> +
> + status = RES_STATUS(priv->rx_msg->data[0]);
> + if (status != priv->success_tag) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Command Id[%d], Response Failure = 0x%x",
> + ELE_PING_REQ, status);
> + ret = -EPERM;
> + }
> +exit:
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +int ele_service_swap(struct device *dev,
> + phys_addr_t addr,
> + u32 addr_size, u16 flag)
> +{
> + struct se_if_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + struct se_api_msg *tx_msg __free(kfree) = NULL;
> + struct se_api_msg *rx_msg __free(kfree) = NULL;
> + u32 status;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + tx_msg = kzalloc(ELE_SERVICE_SWAP_REQ_MSG_SZ, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!tx_msg) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto exit;
> + }
> +
> + rx_msg = kzalloc(ELE_SERVICE_SWAP_RSP_MSG_SZ, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!rx_msg) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto exit;
> + }
> +
> + ret = imx_se_fill_cmd_msg_hdr(priv,
> + (struct se_msg_hdr *)&tx_msg->header,
> + ELE_SERVICE_SWAP_REQ,
> + ELE_SERVICE_SWAP_REQ_MSG_SZ, true);
> + if (ret)
> + goto exit;
> +
> + tx_msg->data[0] = flag;
> + tx_msg->data[1] = addr_size;
> + tx_msg->data[2] = ELE_NONE_VAL;
> + tx_msg->data[3] = lower_32_bits(addr);
> + tx_msg->data[4] = imx_se_add_msg_crc((uint32_t *)&tx_msg[0],
> + ELE_SERVICE_SWAP_REQ_MSG_SZ);
> + ret = imx_ele_msg_send_rcv(priv, tx_msg, rx_msg);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto exit;
> +
> + ret = validate_rsp_hdr(priv,
> + &priv->rx_msg->header,
> + ELE_SERVICE_SWAP_REQ,
> + ELE_SERVICE_SWAP_RSP_MSG_SZ,
> + true);
> + if (ret)
> + goto exit;
> +
> + status = RES_STATUS(priv->rx_msg->data[0]);
> + if (status != priv->success_tag) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Command Id[%d], Response Failure = 0x%x",
> + ELE_SERVICE_SWAP_REQ, status);
> + ret = -EPERM;
> + } else {
> + if (flag == ELE_IMEM_EXPORT)
> + ret = priv->rx_msg->data[1];
> + else
> + ret = 0;
> + }
> +exit:
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +int ele_fw_authenticate(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t addr)
> +{
> + struct se_if_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + struct se_api_msg *tx_msg __free(kfree) = NULL;
> + struct se_api_msg *rx_msg __free(kfree) = NULL;
> + u32 status;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + tx_msg = kzalloc(ELE_FW_AUTH_REQ_SZ, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!tx_msg) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto exit;
> + }
> +
> + rx_msg = kzalloc(ELE_FW_AUTH_RSP_MSG_SZ, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!rx_msg) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto exit;
> + }
> + ret = imx_se_fill_cmd_msg_hdr(priv,
> + (struct se_msg_hdr *)&tx_msg->header,
> + ELE_FW_AUTH_REQ,
> + ELE_FW_AUTH_REQ_SZ,
> + true);
> + if (ret)
> + goto exit;
> +
> + tx_msg->data[0] = addr;
> + tx_msg->data[1] = addr >> 32;
> + tx_msg->data[2] = addr;
Use upper_32_bits() and lower_32_bits() as done elsewhere.
> +
> + ret = imx_ele_msg_send_rcv(priv, tx_msg, rx_msg);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto exit;
> +
> + ret = validate_rsp_hdr(priv,
> + &priv->rx_msg->header,
> + ELE_FW_AUTH_REQ,
> + ELE_FW_AUTH_RSP_MSG_SZ,
> + true);
You should use rx_msg here instead of priv->rx_msg. First of all it
makes the code clearer and also you take the mutex protecting
priv->rx_msg only inside of imx_ele_msg_send_rcv() which means
priv->rx_msg could have been set differently by a concurrent call
already.
Same applies to other places in this file.
> + if (ret)
> + goto exit;
> +
> + status = RES_STATUS(priv->rx_msg->data[0]);
> + if (status != priv->success_tag) {
Apart from priv->rx_msg (which you shouldn't use here) priv->success_tag
is the only member of struct se_if_priv that you actually use in this
file.
You could add a imx_ele_message_status() function to ele_common.c and
make struct se_if_priv opaque to this file.
> + dev_err(dev, "Command Id[%d], Response Failure = 0x%x",
> + ELE_FW_AUTH_REQ, status);
> + ret = -EPERM;
> + }
> +exit:
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/imx/ele_base_msg.h b/drivers/firmware/imx/ele_base_msg.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..7838fe883810
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/imx/ele_base_msg.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ */
> +/*
> + * Copyright 2024 NXP
> + *
> + * Header file for the EdgeLock Enclave Base API(s).
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef ELE_BASE_MSG_H
> +#define ELE_BASE_MSG_H
> +
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
> +#define WORD_SZ 4
> +#define ELE_NONE_VAL 0x0
> +
> +#define ELE_GET_INFO_REQ 0xDA
> +#define ELE_GET_INFO_REQ_MSG_SZ 0x10
> +#define ELE_GET_INFO_RSP_MSG_SZ 0x08
> +
> +#define ELE_GET_INFO_BUFF_SZ 0x100
> +
> +#define DEFAULT_IMX_SOC_VER 0xA000
> +#define SOC_VER_MASK 0xFFFF0000
> +#define SOC_ID_MASK 0x0000FFFF
> +
> +#define MAX_UID_SIZE (16)
> +#define DEV_GETINFO_ROM_PATCH_SHA_SZ (32)
> +#define DEV_GETINFO_FW_SHA_SZ (32)
> +#define DEV_GETINFO_OEM_SRKH_SZ (64)
> +#define DEV_GETINFO_MIN_VER_MASK 0xFF
> +#define DEV_GETINFO_MAJ_VER_MASK 0xFF00
> +
> +struct dev_info {
> + uint8_t cmd;
> + uint8_t ver;
> + uint16_t length;
> + uint16_t soc_id;
> + uint16_t soc_rev;
> + uint16_t lmda_val;
> + uint8_t ssm_state;
> + uint8_t dev_atts_api_ver;
> + uint8_t uid[MAX_UID_SIZE];
> + uint8_t sha_rom_patch[DEV_GETINFO_ROM_PATCH_SHA_SZ];
> + uint8_t sha_fw[DEV_GETINFO_FW_SHA_SZ];
> +};
> +
> +struct dev_addn_info {
> + uint8_t oem_srkh[DEV_GETINFO_OEM_SRKH_SZ];
> + uint8_t trng_state;
> + uint8_t csal_state;
> + uint8_t imem_state;
> + uint8_t reserved2;
> +};
> +
> +struct ele_dev_info {
> + struct dev_info d_info;
> + struct dev_addn_info d_addn_info;
> +};
> +
> +#define GET_SERIAL_NUM_FROM_UID(x, uid_word_sz) \
> + (((u64)(((u32 *)(x))[(uid_word_sz) - 1]) << 32) | ((u32 *)(x))[0])
> +
> +#define ELE_PING_REQ 0x01
> +#define ELE_PING_REQ_SZ 0x04
> +#define ELE_PING_RSP_SZ 0x08
> +
> +#define ELE_SERVICE_SWAP_REQ 0xDF
> +#define ELE_SERVICE_SWAP_REQ_MSG_SZ 0x18
> +#define ELE_SERVICE_SWAP_RSP_MSG_SZ 0x0C
> +#define ELE_IMEM_SIZE 0x10000
> +#define ELE_IMEM_STATE_OK 0xCA
> +#define ELE_IMEM_STATE_BAD 0xFE
> +#define ELE_IMEM_STATE_WORD 0x27
> +#define ELE_IMEM_STATE_MASK 0x00ff0000
> +#define ELE_IMEM_EXPORT 0x1
> +#define ELE_IMEM_IMPORT 0x2
> +
> +#define ELE_FW_AUTH_REQ 0x02
> +#define ELE_FW_AUTH_REQ_SZ 0x10
> +#define ELE_FW_AUTH_RSP_MSG_SZ 0x08
> +
> +int ele_get_info(struct device *dev, struct ele_dev_info *s_info);
> +int ele_fetch_soc_info(struct device *dev, u16 *soc_rev, u64 *serial_num);
> +int ele_ping(struct device *dev);
> +int ele_service_swap(struct device *dev,
> + phys_addr_t addr,
> + u32 addr_size, u16 flag);
> +int ele_fw_authenticate(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t addr);
> +#endif
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/imx/ele_common.c b/drivers/firmware/imx/ele_common.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..0139748f7150
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/imx/ele_common.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,233 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> +/*
> + * Copyright 2024 NXP
> + */
> +
> +#include "ele_base_msg.h"
> +#include "ele_common.h"
> +
> +u32 imx_se_add_msg_crc(u32 *msg, u32 msg_len)
> +{
> + u32 nb_words = msg_len / (u32)sizeof(u32);
> + u32 crc = 0;
> + u32 i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < nb_words - 1; i++)
> + crc ^= *(msg + i);
> +
> + return crc;
> +}
> +
> +int imx_ele_msg_rcv(struct se_if_priv *priv)
> +{
> + u32 wait;
> + int err = 0;
> +
> + lockdep_assert_held(&priv->se_if_cmd_lock);
> +
> + wait = msecs_to_jiffies(1000);
> + if (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&priv->done, wait)) {
> + dev_err(priv->dev,
> + "Error: wait_for_completion timed out.\n");
> + err = -ETIMEDOUT;
> + }
> +
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> +int imx_ele_msg_send(struct se_if_priv *priv, void *tx_msg)
> +{
> + struct se_msg_hdr *header;
> + int err;
> +
> + header = (struct se_msg_hdr *) tx_msg;
Unnecessary cast.
> +
> + if (header->tag == priv->cmd_tag)
> + lockdep_assert_held(&priv->se_if_cmd_lock);
> +
> + scoped_guard(mutex, &priv->se_if_lock);
> +
> + err = mbox_send_message(priv->tx_chan, tx_msg);
> + if (err < 0) {
> + dev_err(priv->dev, "Error: mbox_send_message failure.\n");
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> +/* API used for send/receive blocking call. */
> +int imx_ele_msg_send_rcv(struct se_if_priv *priv, void *tx_msg, void *rx_msg)
> +{
> + int err;
> +
> + scoped_guard(mutex, &priv->se_if_cmd_lock);
> + if (priv->waiting_rsp_dev) {
> + dev_warn(priv->dev,
> + "There should be no misc dev-ctx, waiting for resp.\n");
> + priv->waiting_rsp_dev = NULL;
> + }
> + priv->rx_msg = rx_msg;
> + err = imx_ele_msg_send(priv, tx_msg);
> + if (err < 0)
> + goto exit;
> +
> + err = imx_ele_msg_rcv(priv);
> +
> +exit:
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Callback called by mailbox FW, when data is received.
> + */
> +void se_if_rx_callback(struct mbox_client *mbox_cl, void *msg)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = mbox_cl->dev;
> + struct se_if_priv *priv;
> + struct se_msg_hdr *header;
> +
> + priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> + /* The function can be called with NULL msg */
> + if (!msg) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Message is invalid\n");
Is it really worth spamming the log with this? It doesn't seem to
contain useful information.
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + header = (struct se_msg_hdr *) msg;
No need to cast explicitly.
> +
> + if (header->tag == priv->rsp_tag) {
> + if (!priv->waiting_rsp_dev) {
> + /*
> + * Reading the EdgeLock Enclave response
> + * to the command, sent by other
> + * linux kernel services.
> + */
> + spin_lock(&priv->lock);
> + memcpy(priv->rx_msg, msg, header->size << 2);
You should check that header->size << 2 fits into the rx_msg before
doing this.
> +
> + complete(&priv->done);
> + spin_unlock(&priv->lock);
> + return;
> + }
> + } else {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to select a device for message: %.8x\n",
> + *((u32 *) header));
> + return;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +int validate_rsp_hdr(struct se_if_priv *priv,
> + struct se_msg_hdr *header,
> + uint8_t msg_id,
> + uint8_t sz,
> + bool is_base_api)
> +{
> + if (header->tag != priv->rsp_tag) {
> + dev_err(priv->dev,
> + "MSG[0x%x] Hdr: Resp tag mismatch. (0x%x != 0x%x)",
> + msg_id, header->tag, priv->rsp_tag);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (header->command != msg_id) {
> + dev_err(priv->dev,
> + "MSG Header: Cmd id mismatch. (0x%x != 0x%x)",
> + header->command, msg_id);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (header->size != (sz >> 2)) {
> + dev_err(priv->dev,
> + "MSG[0x%x] Hdr: Cmd size mismatch. (0x%x != 0x%x)",
> + msg_id, header->size, (sz >> 2));
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (is_base_api && (header->ver != priv->base_api_ver)) {
> + dev_err(priv->dev,
> + "MSG[0x%x] Hdr: Base API Vers mismatch. (0x%x != 0x%x)",
> + msg_id, header->ver, priv->base_api_ver);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + } else if (!is_base_api && header->ver != priv->fw_api_ver) {
> + dev_err(priv->dev,
> + "MSG[0x%x] Hdr: FW API Vers mismatch. (0x%x != 0x%x)",
> + msg_id, header->ver, priv->fw_api_ver);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int se_save_imem_state(struct se_if_priv *priv)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + /* EXPORT command will save encrypted IMEM to given address,
> + * so later in resume, IMEM can be restored from the given
> + * address.
> + *
> + * Size must be at least 64 kB.
> + */
> + ret = ele_service_swap(priv->dev,
> + priv->imem.phyaddr,
> + ELE_IMEM_SIZE,
> + ELE_IMEM_EXPORT);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + dev_err(priv->dev, "Failed to export IMEM\n");
> + else
> + dev_info(priv->dev,
> + "Exported %d bytes of encrypted IMEM\n",
> + ret);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +int se_restore_imem_state(struct se_if_priv *priv)
> +{
> + struct ele_dev_info s_info;
> + int ret;
> +
> + /* get info from ELE */
> + ret = ele_get_info(priv->dev, &s_info);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(priv->dev, "Failed to get info from ELE.\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + /* Get IMEM state, if 0xFE then import IMEM */
> + if (s_info.d_addn_info.imem_state == ELE_IMEM_STATE_BAD) {
> + /* IMPORT command will restore IMEM from the given
> + * address, here size is the actual size returned by ELE
> + * during the export operation
> + */
> + ret = ele_service_swap(priv->dev,
> + priv->imem.phyaddr,
> + priv->imem.size,
> + ELE_IMEM_IMPORT);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(priv->dev, "Failed to import IMEM\n");
> + goto exit;
> + }
> + } else
> + goto exit;
> +
> + /* After importing IMEM, check if IMEM state is equal to 0xCA
> + * to ensure IMEM is fully loaded and
> + * ELE functionality can be used.
> + */
> + ret = ele_get_info(priv->dev, &s_info);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(priv->dev, "Failed to get info from ELE.\n");
> + goto exit;
> + }
> +
> + if (s_info.d_addn_info.imem_state == ELE_IMEM_STATE_OK)
> + dev_info(priv->dev, "Successfully restored IMEM\n");
> + else
> + dev_err(priv->dev, "Failed to restore IMEM\n");
> +
> +exit:
> + return ret;
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/imx/ele_common.h b/drivers/firmware/imx/ele_common.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..24569ad29a1f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/imx/ele_common.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ */
> +/*
> + * Copyright 2024 NXP
> + */
> +
> +
> +#ifndef __ELE_COMMON_H__
> +#define __ELE_COMMON_H__
> +
> +#include "se_ctrl.h"
> +
> +#define ELE_SUCCESS_IND 0xD6
> +
> +#define IMX_ELE_FW_DIR "imx/ele/"
> +
> +uint32_t imx_se_add_msg_crc(uint32_t *msg, uint32_t msg_len);
> +int imx_ele_msg_rcv(struct se_if_priv *priv);
> +int imx_ele_msg_send(struct se_if_priv *priv, void *tx_msg);
> +int imx_ele_msg_send_rcv(struct se_if_priv *priv, void *tx_msg, void *rx_msg);
> +void se_if_rx_callback(struct mbox_client *mbox_cl, void *msg);
> +int validate_rsp_hdr(struct se_if_priv *priv,
> + struct se_msg_hdr *header,
> + uint8_t msg_id,
> + uint8_t sz,
> + bool is_base_api);
> +
> +/* Fill a command message header with a given command ID and length in bytes. */
> +static inline int imx_se_fill_cmd_msg_hdr(struct se_if_priv *priv,
> + struct se_msg_hdr *hdr,
> + u8 cmd,
> + u32 len,
> + bool is_base_api)
> +{
> + hdr->tag = priv->cmd_tag;
> + hdr->ver = (is_base_api) ? priv->base_api_ver : priv->fw_api_ver;
> + hdr->command = cmd;
> + hdr->size = len >> 2;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int se_save_imem_state(struct se_if_priv *priv);
> +int se_restore_imem_state(struct se_if_priv *priv);
The function prefixes are still not consistent. We have imx_se_*,
imx_ele_*, ele_* and se_*. Unless these are really different things please
decide for one prefix.
> +
> +#endif /*__ELE_COMMON_H__ */
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/imx/se_ctrl.c b/drivers/firmware/imx/se_ctrl.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..a7a7cacb4416
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/imx/se_ctrl.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,536 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> +/*
> + * Copyright 2024 NXP
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/completion.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/dev_printk.h>
> +#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> +#include <linux/errno.h>
> +#include <linux/export.h>
> +#include <linux/firmware.h>
> +#include <linux/firmware/imx/se_api.h>
> +#include <linux/genalloc.h>
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/miscdevice.h>
> +#include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> +#include <linux/of_reserved_mem.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/string.h>
> +#include <linux/sys_soc.h>
> +
> +#include "ele_base_msg.h"
> +#include "ele_common.h"
> +#include "se_ctrl.h"
> +
> +#define RESERVED_DMA_POOL BIT(0)
> +
> +struct imx_se_node_info {
> + u8 se_if_id;
> + u8 se_if_did;
> + u8 max_dev_ctx;
> + u8 cmd_tag;
> + u8 rsp_tag;
> + u8 success_tag;
> + u8 base_api_ver;
> + u8 fw_api_ver;
> + u8 *se_name;
> + u8 *mbox_tx_name;
> + u8 *mbox_rx_name;
> + u8 *pool_name;
> + u8 *fw_name_in_rfs;
> + bool soc_register;
> + bool reserved_dma_ranges;
> + bool imem_mgmt;
> + int (*se_fetch_soc_info)(struct device *dev, u16 *soc_rev, u64 *serial_num);
> +};
> +
> +struct imx_se_node_info_list {
> + u8 num_mu;
> + u16 soc_id;
> + struct imx_se_node_info info[];
> +};
> +
> +static const struct imx_se_node_info_list imx8ulp_info = {
> + .num_mu = 1,
> + .soc_id = SOC_ID_OF_IMX8ULP,
> + .info = {
> + {
> + .se_if_id = 2,
> + .se_if_did = 7,
> + .max_dev_ctx = 4,
> + .cmd_tag = 0x17,
> + .rsp_tag = 0xe1,
> + .success_tag = ELE_SUCCESS_IND,
> + .base_api_ver = MESSAGING_VERSION_6,
> + .fw_api_ver = MESSAGING_VERSION_7,
> + .se_name = "hsm1",
> + .mbox_tx_name = "tx",
> + .mbox_rx_name = "rx",
> + .pool_name = "sram",
> + .fw_name_in_rfs = IMX_ELE_FW_DIR
> + "mx8ulpa2ext-ahab-container.img",
> + .soc_register = true,
> + .reserved_dma_ranges = true,
> + .imem_mgmt = true,
> + .se_fetch_soc_info = ele_fetch_soc_info,
> + },
> + },
> +};
> +
> +static const struct imx_se_node_info_list imx93_info = {
> + .num_mu = 1,
> + .soc_id = SOC_ID_OF_IMX93,
> + .info = {
> + {
> + .se_if_id = 2,
> + .se_if_did = 3,
> + .max_dev_ctx = 4,
> + .cmd_tag = 0x17,
> + .rsp_tag = 0xe1,
> + .success_tag = ELE_SUCCESS_IND,
> + .base_api_ver = MESSAGING_VERSION_6,
> + .fw_api_ver = MESSAGING_VERSION_7,
> + .se_name = "hsm1",
> + .mbox_tx_name = "tx",
> + .mbox_rx_name = "rx",
> + .reserved_dma_ranges = true,
> + .soc_register = true,
> + },
> + },
> +};
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id se_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "fsl,imx8ulp-se", .data = (void *)&imx8ulp_info},
> + { .compatible = "fsl,imx93-se", .data = (void *)&imx93_info},
> + {},
> +};
> +
> +static const struct imx_se_node_info
> + *get_imx_se_node_info(const struct imx_se_node_info_list *info_list,
> + const u32 idx)
> +{
> + if (idx > info_list->num_mu)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + return &info_list->info[idx];
> +}
> +
> +void *get_phy_buf_mem_pool(struct device *dev,
> + u8 *mem_pool_name,
> + dma_addr_t *buf,
> + u32 size)
> +{
> + struct device_node *of_node = dev->of_node;
> + struct gen_pool *mem_pool;
> +
> + mem_pool = of_gen_pool_get(of_node, mem_pool_name, 0);
> + if (!mem_pool) {
> + dev_err(dev,
> + "Unable to get sram pool = %s\n",
> + mem_pool_name);
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + return gen_pool_dma_alloc(mem_pool, size, buf);
> +}
> +
> +void free_phybuf_mem_pool(struct device *dev,
> + u8 *mem_pool_name,
> + u32 *buf,
> + u32 size)
The function name is not consistent with the get_ function above (phybuf
vs. phy_buf). Also a function prefix would be nice.
> +{
> + struct device_node *of_node = dev->of_node;
> + struct gen_pool *mem_pool;
> +
> + mem_pool = of_gen_pool_get(of_node, mem_pool_name, 0);
> + if (!mem_pool)
> + dev_err(dev,
> + "%s: Failed: Unable to get sram pool.\n",
> + __func__);
> +
> + gen_pool_free(mem_pool, (u64)buf, size);
> +}
> +
> +static int imx_fetch_se_soc_info(struct se_if_priv *priv,
> + const struct imx_se_node_info_list *info_list)
> +{
> + const struct imx_se_node_info *info;
> + struct soc_device_attribute *attr;
> + struct soc_device *sdev;
> + u64 serial_num;
> + u16 soc_rev;
> + int err = 0;
> +
> + info = priv->info;
> +
> + /* This function should be called once.
> + * Check if the soc_rev is zero to continue.
> + */
> + if (priv->soc_rev)
> + return err;
Just return 0 here. It takes one step less to understand what this is
about.
> +
> + if (info->se_fetch_soc_info) {
> + err = info->se_fetch_soc_info(priv->dev, &soc_rev, &serial_num);
> + if (err < 0) {
> + dev_err(priv->dev, "Failed to fetch SoC Info.");
> + return err;
> + }
> + } else {
> + dev_err(priv->dev, "Failed to fetch SoC revision.");
> + if (info->soc_register)
> + dev_err(priv->dev, "Failed to do SoC registration.");
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + return err;
> + }
i.MX93 doesn't have a info->se_fetch_soc_info. Does this mean it doesn't
work on this SoC?
> +
> + priv->soc_rev = soc_rev;
> + if (!info->soc_register)
> + return 0;
> +
> + attr = devm_kzalloc(priv->dev, sizeof(*attr), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!attr)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + if (FIELD_GET(DEV_GETINFO_MIN_VER_MASK, soc_rev))
> + attr->revision = devm_kasprintf(priv->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%x.%x",
> + FIELD_GET(DEV_GETINFO_MIN_VER_MASK,
> + soc_rev),
> + FIELD_GET(DEV_GETINFO_MAJ_VER_MASK,
> + soc_rev));
> + else
> + attr->revision = devm_kasprintf(priv->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%x",
> + FIELD_GET(DEV_GETINFO_MAJ_VER_MASK,
> + soc_rev));
> +
> + switch (info_list->soc_id) {
> + case SOC_ID_OF_IMX8ULP:
> + attr->soc_id = devm_kasprintf(priv->dev, GFP_KERNEL,
> + "i.MX8ULP");
> + break;
> + case SOC_ID_OF_IMX93:
> + attr->soc_id = devm_kasprintf(priv->dev, GFP_KERNEL,
> + "i.MX93");
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + err = of_property_read_string(of_root, "model",
> + &attr->machine);
> + if (err)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + attr->family = devm_kasprintf(priv->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "Freescale i.MX");
> +
> + attr->serial_number
> + = devm_kasprintf(priv->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%016llX", serial_num);
> +
> + sdev = soc_device_register(attr);
> + if (IS_ERR(sdev))
> + return PTR_ERR(sdev);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* interface for managed res to free a mailbox channel */
> +static void if_mbox_free_channel(void *mbox_chan)
> +{
> + mbox_free_channel(mbox_chan);
> +}
> +
> +static int se_if_request_channel(struct device *dev,
> + struct mbox_chan **chan,
> + struct mbox_client *cl,
> + const char *name)
> +{
> + struct mbox_chan *t_chan;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + t_chan = mbox_request_channel_byname(cl, name);
> + if (IS_ERR(t_chan)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(t_chan);
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
> + "Failed to request %s channel.", name);
> + }
> +
> + ret = devm_add_action(dev, if_mbox_free_channel, t_chan);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to add devm removal of mbox %s\n", name);
> + goto exit;
> + }
> +
> + *chan = t_chan;
> +
> +exit:
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int se_probe_if_cleanup(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + struct se_if_priv *priv;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> + if (priv->tx_chan)
> + mbox_free_channel(priv->tx_chan);
> + if (priv->rx_chan)
> + mbox_free_channel(priv->rx_chan);
In se_if_request_channel() you use devm_add_action() to free the mbox
channels. With this you release them twice.
> +
> + /* free the buffer in se remove, previously allocated
> + * in se probe to store encrypted IMEM
> + */
> + if (priv->imem.buf) {
> + dmam_free_coherent(dev,
> + ELE_IMEM_SIZE,
> + priv->imem.buf,
> + priv->imem.phyaddr);
> + priv->imem.buf = NULL;
> + }
> +
> + /* No need to check, if reserved memory is allocated
> + * before calling for its release. Or clearing the
> + * un-set bit.
> + */
> + of_reserved_mem_device_release(dev);
> + priv->flags &= (~RESERVED_DMA_POOL);
priv->flags is only set but never checked. Remove.
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
This function can't fail and I think it shouldn't be able to. Let it
return void.
> +
> +static void se_load_firmware(const struct firmware *fw, void *context)
> +{
> + struct se_if_priv *priv = (struct se_if_priv *) context;
> + const struct imx_se_node_info *info = priv->info;
> + const u8 *se_fw_name = info->fw_name_in_rfs;
> + phys_addr_t se_fw_phyaddr;
> + u8 *se_fw_buf;
> +
> + if (!fw) {
> + if (priv->fw_fail > MAX_FW_LOAD_RETRIES)
> + dev_dbg(priv->dev,
> + "External FW not found, using ROM FW.\n");
> + else {
> + /*add a bit delay to wait for firmware priv released */
> + msleep(20);
> +
> + /* Load firmware one more time if timeout */
> + request_firmware_nowait(THIS_MODULE,
> + FW_ACTION_UEVENT, info->fw_name_in_rfs,
> + priv->dev, GFP_KERNEL, priv,
> + se_load_firmware);
> + priv->fw_fail++;
> + dev_dbg(priv->dev, "Value of retries = 0x%x.\n",
> + priv->fw_fail);
> + }
> +
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + /* allocate buffer to store the SE FW */
> + se_fw_buf = dma_alloc_coherent(priv->dev, fw->size,
> + &se_fw_phyaddr, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!se_fw_buf) {
> + dev_err(priv->dev, "Failed to alloc SE fw buffer memory\n");
> + goto exit;
> + }
> +
> + memcpy(se_fw_buf, fw->data, fw->size);
> +
> + if (ele_fw_authenticate(priv->dev, se_fw_phyaddr))
> + dev_err(priv->dev,
> + "Failed to authenticate & load SE firmware %s.\n",
> + se_fw_name);
> +
> + dma_free_coherent(priv->dev,
> + fw->size,
> + se_fw_buf,
> + se_fw_phyaddr);
> +
> +exit:
> + release_firmware(fw);
> +}
> +
> +static int se_if_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + const struct imx_se_node_info_list *info_list;
> + const struct imx_se_node_info *info;
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + struct se_if_priv *priv;
> + u32 idx;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "reg", &idx)) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto exit;
> + }
> +
> + info_list = device_get_match_data(dev);
> + info = get_imx_se_node_info(info_list, idx);
> + if (!info) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto exit;
> + }
> +
> + priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!priv) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto exit;
> + }
> +
> + dev_set_drvdata(dev, priv);
> +
> + /* Mailbox client configuration */
> + priv->se_mb_cl.dev = dev;
> + priv->se_mb_cl.tx_block = false;
> + priv->se_mb_cl.knows_txdone = true;
> + priv->se_mb_cl.rx_callback = se_if_rx_callback;
> +
> + ret = se_if_request_channel(dev, &priv->tx_chan,
> + &priv->se_mb_cl, info->mbox_tx_name);
> + if (ret)
> + goto exit;
> +
> + ret = se_if_request_channel(dev, &priv->rx_chan,
> + &priv->se_mb_cl, info->mbox_rx_name);
> + if (ret)
> + goto exit;
> +
> + priv->dev = dev;
> + priv->info = info;
> +
> + mutex_init(&priv->se_if_lock);
> + mutex_init(&priv->se_if_cmd_lock);
> +
> + priv->cmd_receiver_dev = NULL;
> + priv->waiting_rsp_dev = NULL;
These are NULL already.
> + priv->max_dev_ctx = info->max_dev_ctx;
> + priv->cmd_tag = info->cmd_tag;
> + priv->rsp_tag = info->rsp_tag;
> + priv->mem_pool_name = info->pool_name;
Instead of storing the mem_pool_name in priv you should call
of_gen_pool_get() directly here and store the returned mem_pool in priv.
It safes you from device tree parsing during runtime and makes the
runtime code simpler.
> + priv->success_tag = info->success_tag;
> + priv->base_api_ver = info->base_api_ver;
> + priv->fw_api_ver = info->fw_api_ver;
> +
> + init_completion(&priv->done);
> + spin_lock_init(&priv->lock);
> +
> + if (info->reserved_dma_ranges) {
> + ret = of_reserved_mem_device_init(dev);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev,
> + "failed to init reserved memory region %d\n",
> + ret);
> + goto exit;
> + }
> + priv->flags |= RESERVED_DMA_POOL;
> + }
> +
> + ret = imx_fetch_se_soc_info(priv, info_list);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev,
> + "failed[%pe] to fetch SoC Info\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
> + goto exit;
> + }
> +
> + if (info->imem_mgmt) {
> + /* allocate buffer where SE store encrypted IMEM */
> + priv->imem.buf = dmam_alloc_coherent(dev, ELE_IMEM_SIZE,
> + &priv->imem.phyaddr,
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!priv->imem.buf) {
> + dev_err(dev,
> + "dmam-alloc-failed: To store encr-IMEM.\n");
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto exit;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (info->fw_name_in_rfs) {
> + ret = request_firmware_nowait(THIS_MODULE,
> + FW_ACTION_UEVENT,
> + info->fw_name_in_rfs,
> + dev, GFP_KERNEL, priv,
> + se_load_firmware);
> + if (ret)
> + dev_warn(dev, "Failed to get firmware [%s].\n",
> + info->fw_name_in_rfs);
> + ret = 0;
> + }
> +
> + dev_info(dev, "i.MX secure-enclave: %s interface to firmware, configured.\n",
> + info->se_name);
> + return ret;
> +
> +exit:
> + /* if execution control reaches here, if probe fails.
> + * hence doing the cleanup
> + */
> + if (se_probe_if_cleanup(pdev))
> + dev_err(dev,
> + "Failed to clean-up the child node probe.\n");
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int se_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + if (se_probe_if_cleanup(pdev))
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> + "i.MX Secure Enclave is not cleanly un-probed.");
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int se_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct se_if_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + const struct imx_se_node_info *info = priv->info;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + if (info && info->imem_mgmt) {
> + ret = se_save_imem_state(priv);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto exit;
> + priv->imem.size = ret;
> + }
> +exit:
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int se_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct se_if_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + const struct imx_se_node_info *info = priv->info;
> +
> + if (info && info->imem_mgmt)
> + se_restore_imem_state(priv);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct dev_pm_ops se_pm = {
> + RUNTIME_PM_OPS(se_suspend, se_resume, NULL)
> +};
> +
> +static struct platform_driver se_driver = {
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "fsl-se-fw",
> + .of_match_table = se_match,
> + .pm = &se_pm,
> + },
> + .probe = se_if_probe,
> + .remove = se_remove,
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, se_match);
> +
> +module_platform_driver(se_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta at nxp.com>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("iMX Secure Enclave Driver.");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/imx/se_ctrl.h b/drivers/firmware/imx/se_ctrl.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..7d4f439a6158
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/imx/se_ctrl.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ */
> +/*
> + * Copyright 2024 NXP
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef SE_MU_H
> +#define SE_MU_H
> +
> +#include <linux/miscdevice.h>
> +#include <linux/semaphore.h>
> +#include <linux/mailbox_client.h>
> +
> +#define MAX_FW_LOAD_RETRIES 50
> +
> +#define RES_STATUS(x) FIELD_GET(0x000000ff, x)
> +#define MESSAGING_VERSION_6 0x6
> +#define MESSAGING_VERSION_7 0x7
> +
> +struct se_imem_buf {
> + u8 *buf;
> + phys_addr_t phyaddr;
> + u32 size;
> +};
> +
> +/* Header of the messages exchange with the EdgeLock Enclave */
> +struct se_msg_hdr {
> + u8 ver;
> + u8 size;
> + u8 command;
> + u8 tag;
> +} __packed;
> +
> +#define SE_MU_HDR_SZ 4
> +
> +struct se_api_msg {
> + struct se_msg_hdr header;
> + u32 data[];
> +};
> +
> +struct se_if_priv {
> + struct se_if_device_ctx *cmd_receiver_dev;
> + /* Update to the waiting_rsp_dev, to be protected
> + * under se_if_lock.
> + */
> + struct se_if_device_ctx *waiting_rsp_dev;
> + /*
> + * prevent parallel access to the se interface registers
> + * e.g. a user trying to send a command while the other one is
> + * sending a response.
> + */
> + struct mutex se_if_lock;
> + /*
> + * prevent a command to be sent on the se interface while another one is
> + * still processing. (response to a command is allowed)
> + */
> + struct mutex se_if_cmd_lock;
> + struct device *dev;
> + u8 *mem_pool_name;
> + u8 cmd_tag;
> + u8 rsp_tag;
> + u8 success_tag;
> + u8 base_api_ver;
> + u8 fw_api_ver;
> + u32 fw_fail;
> + u16 soc_rev;
> + const void *info;
> +
> + struct mbox_client se_mb_cl;
> + struct mbox_chan *tx_chan, *rx_chan;
> +
> + /* Assignment of the rx_msg buffer to held till the
> + * received content as part callback function, is copied.
> + */
> + struct se_api_msg *rx_msg;
> + struct completion done;
> + spinlock_t lock;
> + /*
> + * Flag to retain the state of initialization done at
> + * the time of se-if probe.
> + */
> + uint32_t flags;
> + u8 max_dev_ctx;
> + struct se_if_device_ctx **ctxs;
> + struct se_imem_buf imem;
> +};
> +
> +void *get_phy_buf_mem_pool(struct device *dev,
> + u8 *mem_pool_name,
> + dma_addr_t *buf,
> + u32 size);
> +phys_addr_t get_phy_buf_mem_pool1(struct device *dev,
> + u8 *mem_pool_name,
> + u32 **buf,
> + u32 size);
This function prototype is unused.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list