[PATCH v3 03/24] PCI/MSI: Provide MSI_FLAG_PCI_MSI_MASK_PARENT
Thomas Gleixner
tglx at linutronix.de
Mon Jun 17 05:52:03 PDT 2024
On Fri, Jun 14 2024 at 11:09, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 12:23:42PM +0200, Shivamurthy Shastri wrote:
>> Most ARM(64) PCI/MSI domains mask and unmask in the parent domain after or
>> before the PCI mask/unmask operation takes place. So there are more than a
>> dozen of the same wrapper implementation all over the place.
>
> Is this an opportunity to clean up all these wrappers? If you could
> mention an example or two here, maybe somebody would be motivated to
> come back and simplify the existing wrappers to take advantage of this
> new flag?
The wrappers go away once the relevant MSI implementations are converted
over to the new scheme/
See patch 7 for an example: its_[un]mask_msi_irq() are gone.
Thanks,
tglx
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list