[RFC PATCH v1 0/2] KVM: arm64: Making BT Field in ID_AA64PFR1_EL1 writable

Shaoqin Huang shahuang at redhat.com
Mon Jun 17 05:29:26 PDT 2024


Hi Marc,

On 6/13/24 16:42, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 09:31:45 +0100,
> Shaoqin Huang <shahuang at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> If we don't care about the FEAT_CNTSC right now. Could I fix the
>> compile issue and respin this again without the background of enabling
>> migration between MtCollins and AmpereOne, and just keep the
>> information of the different BT field between different machine?
> 
> As I said, I think this patch is valuable. But maybe you should
> consider tackling the full register, rather than only addressing a
> single field.

Yes, it would be better to tackling the full register. I will put more 
time on other fields in the register and try to making more field to be 
writable. But currently I just respin the series with deleting the 
machine specific information and fixing the compilation issue.

Thanks,
Shaoqin

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	M.
> 

-- 
Shaoqin




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list