[PATCH] scripts/make_fit: Support decomposing DTBs
Masahiro Yamada
masahiroy at kernel.org
Tue Jun 11 07:32:53 PDT 2024
On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 6:48 PM Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst at chromium.org> wrote:
>
> The kernel tree builds some "composite" DTBs, where the final DTB is the
> result of applying one or more DTB overlays on top of a base DTB with
> fdtoverlay.
>
> The FIT image specification already supports configurations having one
> base DTB and overlays applied on top. It is then up to the bootloader to
> apply said overlays and either use or pass on the final result. This
> allows the FIT image builder to reuse the same FDT images for multiple
> configurations, if such cases exist.
>
> The decomposition function depends on the kernel build system, reading
> back the .cmd files for the to-be-packaged DTB files to check for the
> fdtoverlay command being called. This will not work outside the kernel
> tree. The function is off by default to keep compatibility with possible
> existing users.
>
> To facilitate the decomposition and keep the code clean, the model and
> compatitble string extraction have been moved out of the output_dtb
> function. The FDT image description is replaced with the base file name
> of the included image.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst at chromium.org>
> ---
> This is a feature I alluded to in my replies to Simon's original
> submission of the make_fit.py script [1].
>
> This is again made a runtime argument as not all firmware out there
> that boot FIT images support applying overlays. Like my previous
> submission for disabling compression for included FDT images, the
> bootloader found in RK3399 and MT8173 Chromebooks do not support
> applying overlays. Another case of this is U-boot shipped by development
> board vendors in binary form (without upstream) in an image or in
> SPI flash on the board that were built with OF_LIBFDT_OVERLAY=n.
> These would fail to boot FIT images with DT overlays. One such
> example is my Hummingboard Pulse. In these cases the firmware is
> either not upgradable or very hard to upgrade.
>
> I believe there is value in supporting these cases. A common script
> shipped with the kernel source that can be shared by distros means
> the distro people don't have to reimplement this in their downstream
> repos or meta-packages. For ChromeOS this means reducing the amount
> of package code we have in shell script.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kbuild/20231207142723.GA3187877@google.com/
> [2]
>
> scripts/Makefile.lib | 1 +
> scripts/make_fit.py | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.lib b/scripts/Makefile.lib
> index 9f06f6aaf7fc..d78b5d38beaa 100644
> --- a/scripts/Makefile.lib
> +++ b/scripts/Makefile.lib
> @@ -522,6 +522,7 @@ quiet_cmd_fit = FIT $@
> cmd_fit = $(MAKE_FIT) -o $@ --arch $(UIMAGE_ARCH) --os linux \
> --name '$(UIMAGE_NAME)' \
> $(if $(findstring 1,$(KBUILD_VERBOSE)),-v) \
> + $(if $(FIT_DECOMPOSE_DTBS),--decompose-dtbs) \
> --compress $(FIT_COMPRESSION) -k $< @$(word 2,$^)
>
> # XZ
> diff --git a/scripts/make_fit.py b/scripts/make_fit.py
> index 263147df80a4..120f13e1323c 100755
> --- a/scripts/make_fit.py
> +++ b/scripts/make_fit.py
> @@ -22,6 +22,11 @@ the entire FIT.
> Use -c to compress the data, using bzip2, gzip, lz4, lzma, lzo and
> zstd algorithms.
>
> +Use -d to decompose "composite" DTBs into their base components and
> +deduplicate the resulting base DTBs and DTB overlays. This requires the
> +DTBs to be sourced from the kernel build directory, as the implementation
> +looks at the .cmd files produced by the kernel build.
> +
> The resulting FIT can be booted by bootloaders which support FIT, such
> as U-Boot, Linuxboot, Tianocore, etc.
>
> @@ -64,6 +69,8 @@ def parse_args():
> help='Specifies the architecture')
> parser.add_argument('-c', '--compress', type=str, default='none',
> help='Specifies the compression')
> + parser.add_argument('-d', '--decompose-dtbs', action='store_true',
> + help='Decompose composite DTBs into base DTB and overlays')
> parser.add_argument('-E', '--external', action='store_true',
> help='Convert the FIT to use external data')
> parser.add_argument('-n', '--name', type=str, required=True,
> @@ -140,12 +147,12 @@ def finish_fit(fsw, entries):
> fsw.end_node()
> seq = 0
> with fsw.add_node('configurations'):
> - for model, compat in entries:
> + for model, compat, files in entries:
> seq += 1
> with fsw.add_node(f'conf-{seq}'):
> fsw.property('compatible', bytes(compat))
> fsw.property_string('description', model)
> - fsw.property_string('fdt', f'fdt-{seq}')
> + fsw.property('fdt', b''.join([b'fdt-%d\x00' % x for x in files]))
> fsw.property_string('kernel', 'kernel')
> fsw.end_node()
>
> @@ -193,21 +200,9 @@ def output_dtb(fsw, seq, fname, arch, compress):
> fname (str): Filename containing the DTB
> arch: FIT architecture, e.g. 'arm64'
> compress (str): Compressed algorithm, e.g. 'gzip'
> -
> - Returns:
> - tuple:
> - str: Model name
> - bytes: Compatible stringlist
> """
> with fsw.add_node(f'fdt-{seq}'):
> - # Get the compatible / model information
> - with open(fname, 'rb') as inf:
> - data = inf.read()
> - fdt = libfdt.FdtRo(data)
> - model = fdt.getprop(0, 'model').as_str()
> - compat = fdt.getprop(0, 'compatible')
> -
> - fsw.property_string('description', model)
> + fsw.property_string('description', os.path.basename(fname))
> fsw.property_string('type', 'flat_dt')
> fsw.property_string('arch', arch)
> fsw.property_string('compression', compress)
> @@ -215,7 +210,6 @@ def output_dtb(fsw, seq, fname, arch, compress):
> with open(fname, 'rb') as inf:
> compressed = compress_data(inf, compress)
> fsw.property('data', compressed)
> - return model, compat
>
>
> def build_fit(args):
> @@ -235,6 +229,7 @@ def build_fit(args):
> fsw = libfdt.FdtSw()
> setup_fit(fsw, args.name)
> entries = []
> + fdts = collections.OrderedDict()
I am fine with this patch.
Just a nit.
Is there any reason why you used OrderedDict() instead of
the normal dictionary, "fdts = {}" ?
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list