[PATCH v4 1/8] dt-bindings: counter: Add new ti,am62-eqep compatible
Judith Mendez
jm at ti.com
Mon Jun 10 15:13:59 PDT 2024
Hi Krzysztof,
On 6/10/24 9:58 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 10/06/2024 16:46, Judith Mendez wrote:
>> Add new compatible ti,am62-eqep for TI K3 devices. If a device
>> uses this compatible, require power-domains property.
>>
>> Since there is only one functional and interface clock for eqep,
>> clock-names is not really required, so removed from required
>> section, make it optional for ti,am3352-eqep compatible, and
>> update the example.
>>
>
> ...
>
>
>> interrupts = <79>;
>> };
>>
>> + - |
>> + #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
>> + #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
>> + #include <dt-bindings/soc/ti,sci_pm_domain.h>
>> +
>> + bus {
>> + #address-cells = <2>;
>> + #size-cells = <2>;
>> + eqep1: counter at 23210000 {
>
> No need for label
>
>> + compatible = "ti,am62-eqep";
>> + reg = <0x00 0x23210000 0x00 0x100>;
>> + power-domains = <&k3_pds 60 TI_SCI_PD_EXCLUSIVE>;
>> + clocks = <&k3_clks 60 0>;
>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 117 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
>> + status = "disabled";
>
> Drop... which also points to another comment - since this was no-op and
> example is basically the same, then just don't add it. No point.
Ok, then I will drop the new example, thanks.
BTW..
In the existing example for ti,am3352-eqep compatible,
do you know if it is appropriate to drop clock-names
from the example if it is no longer required?
~ Judith
>
>> + };
>> + };
>> ...
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list