[PATCH 2/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Do not zero the strtab twice
Mostafa Saleh
smostafa at google.com
Tue Jun 4 08:56:04 PDT 2024
Hi Jason,
On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 07:31:28PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> dmam_alloc_coherent() already returns zero'd memory so cfg->strtab.l1_desc
> (the list of DMA addresses for the L2 entries) is already zero'd.
>
> arm_smmu_init_l1_strtab() goes through and calls
> arm_smmu_write_strtab_l1_desc() on the newly allocated (and zero'd) struct
> arm_smmu_strtab_l1_desc, which ends up computing 'val = 0' and zeroing it
> again.
>
> Remove arm_smmu_init_l1_strtab() and just call devm_kcalloc() from
> arm_smmu_init_strtab_2lvl to allocate the companion struct.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at nvidia.com>
Looking at the code for dmam_alloc_coherent(basically dma_alloc_coherent)
I see that the memory is zeroed for both DMA direct and IOMMU, however
I don’t see that documented (in DMA-API.txt).
Assuming that’s guaranteed to be zeroed (maybe we should update the docs
if I am not missing something)
Reviewed-by: Mostafa Saleh <smostafa at google.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 27 +++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> index 6b4f1a664288db..d27dd0600bf1df 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> @@ -3220,23 +3220,6 @@ static int arm_smmu_init_queues(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> PRIQ_ENT_DWORDS, "priq");
> }
>
> -static int arm_smmu_init_l1_strtab(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> -{
> - unsigned int i;
> - struct arm_smmu_strtab_cfg *cfg = &smmu->strtab_cfg;
> -
> - cfg->l1_desc = devm_kcalloc(smmu->dev, cfg->num_l1_ents,
> - sizeof(*cfg->l1_desc), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!cfg->l1_desc)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < cfg->num_l1_ents; ++i)
> - arm_smmu_write_strtab_l1_desc(
> - &smmu->strtab_cfg.strtab.l1_desc[i], &cfg->l1_desc[i]);
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> static int arm_smmu_init_strtab_2lvl(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> {
> void *strtab;
> @@ -3272,7 +3255,15 @@ static int arm_smmu_init_strtab_2lvl(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> reg |= FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_BASE_CFG_SPLIT, STRTAB_SPLIT);
> cfg->strtab_base_cfg = reg;
>
> - return arm_smmu_init_l1_strtab(smmu);
> + cfg->l1_desc = devm_kcalloc(smmu->dev, cfg->num_l1_ents,
> + sizeof(*cfg->l1_desc), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!cfg->l1_desc) {
> + dev_err(smmu->dev,
> + "failed to allocate l1 stream table (%zu bytes)\n",
> + cfg->num_l1_ents * sizeof(*cfg->l1_desc));
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static int arm_smmu_init_strtab_linear(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> --
> 2.45.2
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list