[PATCH v2 1/5] dt-bindings: clock: Add i.MX91 clock support

Rob Herring robh at kernel.org
Tue Jun 4 08:03:06 PDT 2024


On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 07:26:30PM -0700, Pengfei Li wrote:
> i.MX91 has similar Clock Control Module(CCM) design as i.MX93.
> Add a new compatible string for i.MX91.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pengfei Li <pengfei.li_1 at nxp.com>
> Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li at nxp.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/imx93-clock.yaml | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/imx93-clock.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/imx93-clock.yaml
> index ccb53c6b96c1..98c0800732ef 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/imx93-clock.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/imx93-clock.yaml
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ description: |
>  properties:
>    compatible:
>      enum:
> +      - fsl,imx91-ccm
>        - fsl,imx93-ccm

Should fallback to fsl,imx93-ccm? Being a superset should be ok because 
your DT should never use the non-existent clocks. If not, where is the 
driver change?

Rob



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list