[PATCH v3 07/11] net: ethernet: stmmac: add management of stm32mp13 for stm32

[Christophe ROULLIER]

On 6/3/24 13:30, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On 03/06/2024 11.27, Christophe Roullier wrote:
>
>> @@ -259,13 +268,17 @@ static int stm32mp1_configure_pmcr(struct plat_stmmacenet_data *plat_dat)
>>   
>>   	dev_dbg(dwmac->dev, "Mode %s", phy_modes(plat_dat->mac_interface));
>>   
>> +	/* Shift value at correct ethernet MAC offset in SYSCFG_PMCSETR */
>> +	val <<= ffs(dwmac->mode_mask) - ffs(SYSCFG_MP1_ETH_MASK);
>> +
>>   	/* Need to update PMCCLRR (clear register) */
>> -	regmap_write(dwmac->regmap, reg + SYSCFG_PMCCLRR_OFFSET,
>> -		     dwmac->ops->syscfg_eth_mask);
>> +	regmap_write(dwmac->regmap, dwmac->ops->syscfg_clr_off,
>> +		     dwmac->mode_mask);
>>   
>>   	/* Update PMCSETR (set register) */
>>   	return regmap_update_bits(dwmac->regmap, reg,
>> -				 dwmac->ops->syscfg_eth_mask, val);
>> +				 dwmac->mode_mask, val);
>>   }
>>   
>>   static int stm32mp1_set_mode(struct plat_stmmacenet_data *plat_dat)
> This hunk is broken, and makes the patch not apply:
>
> Applying: net: ethernet: stmmac: add management of stm32mp13 for stm32
> error: corrupt patch at line 70
>
> The -259,13 seems correct, and the net lines added by previous hunks is
> indeed +9, but this hunk only adds three more lines than it removes, not
> four, so the +268,17 should have been +268,16.
>
> Have you manually edited this patch before sending? If so, please don't
> do that, it makes people waste a lot of time figuring out what is wrong.

Hi Rasmus,

Yes sorry :-(

>
> Also, please include a base-id in the cover letter so one knows what it
> applies to.
>
> Finally, I think you also need to sign-off on the patches you send
> authored by Marek.
Yes, you are right
>
> Rasmus
>