[PATCH] arm64/crypto: Raise priority of NEON crct10dif implementation

[Mark Brown]

On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 02:15:08PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 12:17:41PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 09:22:49PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > The NEON implementation of crctd10dif is registered with a priority of 100
> > > which is identical to that used by the generic C implementation. Raise the
> > > priority to 150, half way between the PMULL based implementation and the
> > > NEON one, so that it will be preferred over the generic implementation.

> > That second NEON should be PMULL, sorry.

> Sorry, I don't grok that now:

>   | half way between the PMULL based implementation and the PMULL one

> doesn't mean anything?

Yes, one of those PMULLs should say generic (I thought I'd sent a
followup saying that, sorry).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20240603/7146672a/attachment.sig>