[PATCH v4 2/9] KVM: arm64: Fix prototype for __sve_save_state/__sve_restore_state

[Fuad Tabba]

Since the prototypes for __sve_save_state/__sve_restore_state at
hyp were added, the underlying macro has acquired a third
parameter for saving/restoring ffr.

Fix the prototypes to account for the third parameter, and
restore the ffr for the guest since it is saved.

Suggested-by: Mark Brown <broonie at kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba at google.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h        | 4 ++--
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h | 3 ++-
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h
index 2ab23589339a..686cce7e4e96 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h
@@ -111,8 +111,8 @@ void __debug_restore_host_buffers_nvhe(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 
 void __fpsimd_save_state(struct user_fpsimd_state *fp_regs);
 void __fpsimd_restore_state(struct user_fpsimd_state *fp_regs);
-void __sve_save_state(void *sve_pffr, u32 *fpsr);
-void __sve_restore_state(void *sve_pffr, u32 *fpsr);
+void __sve_save_state(void *sve_pffr, u32 *fpsr, int save_ffr);
+void __sve_restore_state(void *sve_pffr, u32 *fpsr, int restore_ffr);
 
 u64 __guest_enter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
index a92566f36022..d58933ae8fd5 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
@@ -316,7 +316,8 @@ static inline void __hyp_sve_restore_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	sve_cond_update_zcr_vq(vcpu_sve_max_vq(vcpu) - 1, SYS_ZCR_EL2);
 	__sve_restore_state(vcpu_sve_pffr(vcpu),
-			    &vcpu->arch.ctxt.fp_regs.fpsr);
+			    &vcpu->arch.ctxt.fp_regs.fpsr,
+			    true);
 	write_sysreg_el1(__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, ZCR_EL1), SYS_ZCR);
 }
 
-- 
2.45.1.288.g0e0cd299f1-goog