[PATCH 2/2] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: add sdm670 adreno iommu compatible

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 08:23:44AM GMT, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 30/07/2024 03:38, Richard Acayan wrote:
> > Add the compatible for the separate IOMMU on SDM670 for the Adreno GPU.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Richard Acayan <mailingradian at gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> > index 36c6b36ad4ff..7f4b15be4a11 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> > @@ -539,6 +539,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id __maybe_unused qcom_smmu_impl_of_match[] = {
> >  	{ .compatible = "qcom,sc8180x-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
> >  	{ .compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
> >  	{ .compatible = "qcom,sdm630-smmu-v2", .data = &qcom_smmu_v2_data },
> > +	{ .compatible = "qcom,sdm670-smmu-v2", .data = &qcom_smmu_v2_data },
> 
> Do the people even read the comments? What the comment is saying? I
> admit it might be not precise, but "500" and "v2" are the same from that
> point of view.

Well, the comment speaks about -500 explicitly, because -v2 have
differences (it is known that these platforms require more quirks).

> 
> NAK.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry