[PATCH v4 15/29] arm64: handle PKEY/POE faults

Dave Martin Dave.Martin at arm.com
Thu Jul 25 08:57:09 PDT 2024


On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 02:01:33PM +0100, Joey Gouly wrote:
> If a memory fault occurs that is due to an overlay/pkey fault, report that to
> userspace with a SEGV_PKUERR.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly at arm.com>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas at arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will at kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/traps.h |  1 +
>  arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c      | 12 ++++++--
>  arch/arm64/mm/fault.c          | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  3 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/traps.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/traps.h
> index eefe766d6161..f6f6f2cb7f10 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/traps.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/traps.h
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ try_emulate_armv8_deprecated(struct pt_regs *regs, u32 insn)
>  void force_signal_inject(int signal, int code, unsigned long address, unsigned long err);
>  void arm64_notify_segfault(unsigned long addr);
>  void arm64_force_sig_fault(int signo, int code, unsigned long far, const char *str);
> +void arm64_force_sig_fault_pkey(int signo, int code, unsigned long far, const char *str, int pkey);
>  void arm64_force_sig_mceerr(int code, unsigned long far, short lsb, const char *str);
>  void arm64_force_sig_ptrace_errno_trap(int errno, unsigned long far, const char *str);
>  
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
> index 215e6d7f2df8..1bac6c84d3f5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
> @@ -263,16 +263,24 @@ static void arm64_show_signal(int signo, const char *str)
>  	__show_regs(regs);
>  }
>  
> -void arm64_force_sig_fault(int signo, int code, unsigned long far,
> -			   const char *str)
> +void arm64_force_sig_fault_pkey(int signo, int code, unsigned long far,
> +			   const char *str, int pkey)
>  {
>  	arm64_show_signal(signo, str);
>  	if (signo == SIGKILL)
>  		force_sig(SIGKILL);
> +	else if (code == SEGV_PKUERR)
> +		force_sig_pkuerr((void __user *)far, pkey);

Is signo definitely SIGSEGV here?  It looks to me like we can get in
here for SIGBUS, SIGTRAP etc.

si_codes are not unique between different signo here, so I'm wondering
whether this should this be:

	else if (signo == SIGSEGV && code == SEGV_PKUERR)

...?


>  	else
>  		force_sig_fault(signo, code, (void __user *)far);
>  }
>  
> +void arm64_force_sig_fault(int signo, int code, unsigned long far,
> +			   const char *str)
> +{
> +	arm64_force_sig_fault_pkey(signo, code, far, str, 0);

Is there a reason not to follow the same convention as elsewhere, where
-1 is passed for "no pkey"?

If we think this should never be called with signo == SIGSEGV &&
code == SEGV_PKUERR and no valid pkey but if it's messy to prove, then
maybe a WARN_ON_ONCE() would be worth it here?

[...]

Cheers
---Dave



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list