[PATCH RFC v2 2/4] arm: dts: marvell: armada-38x: add description for usb phys

[Andrew Lunn]

On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 08:23:09PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 20/07/2024 15:19, Josua Mayer wrote:
> > Am 17.07.24 um 14:04 schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
> >> On 16/07/2024 22:52, Josua Mayer wrote:
> >>> Armada 38x has 3x USB-2.0 utmi phys. They are almost identical to the 2x
> >>> utmi phys on armada 8k.
> >>>
> >>> Add descriptions for all 3 phy ports.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Josua Mayer <josua at solid-run.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/marvell/armada-38x.dtsi | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/marvell/armada-38x.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/marvell/armada-38x.dtsi
> >>> index 446861b6b17b..701a1c0c19ad 100644
> >>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/marvell/armada-38x.dtsi
> >>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/marvell/armada-38x.dtsi
> >>> @@ -392,6 +392,11 @@ comphy5: phy at 5 {
> >>>  				};
> >>>  			};
> >>>  
> >>> +			syscon0: system-controller at 18400 {
> >>> +				compatible = "syscon", "simple-mfd";
> >> That's not a valid pair. They cannot be alone.
> > Curious! I have seen it in armada-cp11x.dtsi.
> 
> Old code, I don't think anyone is working on armada and other Marvell
> chips, so by copying old code you will copy bugs or wrong designs. I can
> only suggest to work on recent platform where such oddities are fixed...

As you say, these are old platform. I'm not sure they are actually
buggy or wrong design, it is more that current day best practice is
different to the best practice back then. This was from before the
time linting tools and .yaml existed for DT.

The kirkwood-b3.dts i wrote in 2013 still works, my NAS box gets its
kernel updated about once a year, and a new disk about every 8
years. These systems can keep running for a long time. We have to
accept there will be legacy DT.

       Andrew