[PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add Firefly Core-PX30-JD4 with baseboard

[Dragan Simic]

On 2024-07-18 10:34, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 09:31:45AM +0100, Christopher Obbard wrote:
>> Thanks for the review.
>> 
>> On Thu, 2024-07-18 at 06:36 +0200, Dragan Simic wrote:
>> > Hello Christopher,
>> >
>> > On 2024-07-17 18:46, Christopher Obbard wrote:
>> > > Add binding for the Firefly Core-PX30-JD4 SoM when used in conjunction
>> > > with the MB-JD4-RK3328 & PX30 baseboard.
>> > >
>> > > Signed-off-by: Christopher Obbard <chris.obbard at collabora.com>
>> > > ---
>> > >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml | 6 ++++++
>> > >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>> > >
>> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml
>> > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml
>> > > index 1ef09fbfdfaf5..33ca8028bc151 100644
>> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml
>> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml
>> > > @@ -148,6 +148,12 @@ properties:
>> > >            - const: engicam,px30-core
>> > >            - const: rockchip,px30
>> > >
>> > > +      - description: Firefly Core-PX30-JD4 with MB-JD4-PX30 baseboard
>> > > +        items:
>> > > +          - const: firefly,px30-mb-jd4
>> > > +          - const: firefly,px30-core-jd4
>> >
>> > Similarly to how I suggested the new dts(i) files to be named, [1]
>> > the model names should be named like this:
>> >
>> >            - const: firefly,px30-jd4-core
>> >            - const: firefly,px30-jd4-core-mb
>> 
>> I suppose the order should be the other way around to match other 
>> entries, e.g
>> firefly,px30-jd4-core-mb first?
> 
> Yes. Mainboard first, then som, then soc.

Ah yes, sorry, I somehow managed to get the order wrong.  Basically,
it goes from more specific to less specific.