[PATCH 1/2] pwm: atmel-tcb: Fix race condition and convert to guards
Nicolas Ferre
nicolas.ferre at microchip.com
Wed Jul 10 07:17:09 PDT 2024
On 09/07/2024 at 12:18, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
> The hardware only supports a single period length for both PWM outputs. So
> atmel_tcb_pwm_config() checks the configuration of the other output if it's
> compatible with the currently requested setting. The register values are
> then actually updated in atmel_tcb_pwm_enable(). To make this race free
> the lock must be held during the whole process, so grab the lock in
> .apply() instead of individually in atmel_tcb_pwm_disable() and
> atmel_tcb_pwm_enable() which then also covers atmel_tcb_pwm_config().
>
> To simplify handling, use the guard helper to let the compiler care for
> unlocking. Otherwise unlocking would be more difficult as there is more
> than one exit path in atmel_tcb_pwm_apply().
>
> Fixes: 9421bade0765 ("pwm: atmel: add Timer Counter Block PWM driver")
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig at baylibre.com>
Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre at microchip.com>
And I like the conversion to the "guard" lock helper.
Best regards,
Nicolas
> ---
> drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel-tcb.c | 12 +++++-------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel-tcb.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel-tcb.c
> index 528e54c5999d..aca11493239a 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel-tcb.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel-tcb.c
> @@ -81,7 +81,8 @@ static int atmel_tcb_pwm_request(struct pwm_chip *chip,
> tcbpwm->period = 0;
> tcbpwm->div = 0;
>
> - spin_lock(&tcbpwmc->lock);
> + guard(spinlock)(&tcbpwmc->lock);
> +
> regmap_read(tcbpwmc->regmap, ATMEL_TC_REG(tcbpwmc->channel, CMR), &cmr);
> /*
> * Get init config from Timer Counter registers if
> @@ -107,7 +108,6 @@ static int atmel_tcb_pwm_request(struct pwm_chip *chip,
>
> cmr |= ATMEL_TC_WAVE | ATMEL_TC_WAVESEL_UP_AUTO | ATMEL_TC_EEVT_XC0;
> regmap_write(tcbpwmc->regmap, ATMEL_TC_REG(tcbpwmc->channel, CMR), cmr);
> - spin_unlock(&tcbpwmc->lock);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -137,7 +137,6 @@ static void atmel_tcb_pwm_disable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> if (tcbpwm->duty == 0)
> polarity = !polarity;
>
> - spin_lock(&tcbpwmc->lock);
> regmap_read(tcbpwmc->regmap, ATMEL_TC_REG(tcbpwmc->channel, CMR), &cmr);
>
> /* flush old setting and set the new one */
> @@ -172,8 +171,6 @@ static void atmel_tcb_pwm_disable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> ATMEL_TC_SWTRG);
> tcbpwmc->bkup.enabled = 0;
> }
> -
> - spin_unlock(&tcbpwmc->lock);
> }
>
> static int atmel_tcb_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> @@ -194,7 +191,6 @@ static int atmel_tcb_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> if (tcbpwm->duty == 0)
> polarity = !polarity;
>
> - spin_lock(&tcbpwmc->lock);
> regmap_read(tcbpwmc->regmap, ATMEL_TC_REG(tcbpwmc->channel, CMR), &cmr);
>
> /* flush old setting and set the new one */
> @@ -256,7 +252,6 @@ static int atmel_tcb_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> regmap_write(tcbpwmc->regmap, ATMEL_TC_REG(tcbpwmc->channel, CCR),
> ATMEL_TC_SWTRG | ATMEL_TC_CLKEN);
> tcbpwmc->bkup.enabled = 1;
> - spin_unlock(&tcbpwmc->lock);
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -341,9 +336,12 @@ static int atmel_tcb_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> static int atmel_tcb_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> const struct pwm_state *state)
> {
> + struct atmel_tcb_pwm_chip *tcbpwmc = to_tcb_chip(chip);
> int duty_cycle, period;
> int ret;
>
> + guard(spinlock)(&tcbpwmc->lock);
> +
> if (!state->enabled) {
> atmel_tcb_pwm_disable(chip, pwm, state->polarity);
> return 0;
>
> base-commit: 120a528213b6693214e3cbc24a9c3052a4b1024b
> --
> 2.43.0
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list