[PATCH] clk: imx: imx8: Add .name for "acm_aud_clk0_sel" and "acm_aud_clk1_sel"

[Shengjiu Wang]

On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 6:45 AM Stephen Boyd <sboyd at kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Quoting Shengjiu Wang (2024-07-03 01:52:51)
> > "acm_aud_clk0_sel" and "acm_aud_clk1_sel" are registered by this ACM
> > driver, but they are the parent clocks for other clocks, in order to
> > use assigned-clock-parents in device tree, they need to have the
> > global name.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang at nxp.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx8-acm.c | 12 ++++++------
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx8-acm.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx8-acm.c
> > index 1bdb480cc96c..a1affcf6daff 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx8-acm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx8-acm.c
> > @@ -114,8 +114,8 @@ static const struct clk_parent_data imx8qm_mclk_out_sels[] = {
> >  static const struct clk_parent_data imx8qm_mclk_sels[] = {
> >         { .fw_name = "aud_pll_div_clk0_lpcg_clk" },
> >         { .fw_name = "aud_pll_div_clk1_lpcg_clk" },
> > -       { .fw_name = "acm_aud_clk0_sel" },
> > -       { .fw_name = "acm_aud_clk1_sel" },
> > +       { .fw_name = "acm_aud_clk0_sel", .name = "acm_aud_clk0_sel" },
> > +       { .fw_name = "acm_aud_clk1_sel", .name = "acm_aud_clk1_sel" },
>
> This doesn't make any sense. Why are we adding fallback names?  Is
> "acm_aud_clk0_sel" not part of the DT binding for this clk controller?

It is not part of DT binding for this clk controller.  it is registered by this
clk controller itself.  As it is a parent clock, so my understanding
is that we need to add a fallback name,  or change "fw_name" to "name",
please correct me if I am wrong.

Best regards
Shengjiu Wang