[PATCH 00/20] iio: make masklength __private (round 1)

[Jonathan Cameron]

On Wed, 03 Jul 2024 09:10:58 +0200
Nuno Sá <noname.nuno at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 2024-07-02 at 21:26 +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Tue, 02 Jul 2024 18:02:32 +0200
> > Nuno Sa via B4 Relay <devnull+nuno.sa.analog.com at kernel.org> wrote:
> >   
> > > Hi Jonathan,
> > > 
> > > Here it goes the first round of what we discussed in [1] about
> > > annotating .masklength as __private. Patches should be fairly simple so
> > > hopefully I did not messed up much...
> > > 
> > > Note that in core, there's one place where we're still directly writing
> > > into .masklength (when it's effectively set). The plan is then to
> > > directly use ACCESS_PRIVATE() in there in the same patch where we mark
> > > .masklength as __private.  
> > 
> > Makes sense. Series looks good to me, but I'll not pick it up just yet.
> > I've tagged a like second 6.11 pull request, so this is probably 6.12 material
> > unless things go particularly smoothly and Greg takes an additional last
> > minute one as there is one set waiting for a fix that is in char-misc
> > but not yet iio-togreg.
> > 
> > Jonathan
> >   
> 
> Yeah, looks sane to me. Advantage of going in 6.12 is that (likely) we'' get all
> the conversions done.

Given I'm not planning to send another pull request (no time for suitable
testing in linux-next etc) for 6.11 I've started queuing up as probable
6.12 material.

Usual process applies at this stage - I won't be pushing out as togreg
until I can rebase on rc1.

Applied and pushed out as testing for now with the typo Alexandru
pointed out in adxl372 fixed up.

Jonathan
> 
> - Nuno Sá
> >   
>